Mental Capacity vs Mental Competence

Let’s com­pare men­tal capa­city vs men­tal com­pet­ence.

I’m on a mis­sion to think bet­ter.

We’re all born with cer­tain lim­it­a­tions. However, we under­es­tim­ate how much bet­ter thinkers we can become by tak­ing a more stra­tegic approach to one of the most fun­da­ment­al human activ­it­ies—think­ing.

Here we go:

Mental Capacity vs Mental Competence

As a PR pro­fes­sion­al, I often meet with exper­i­enced, intel­li­gent, ambi­tious, con­scien­tious, cre­at­ive, and highly motiv­ated decision-makers. If you have the fin­an­cial man­date to invest in pub­lic rela­tions coun­sel, you’re likely to be a per­son of substance.

Still, I’m amazed almost daily at how oth­er­wise accom­plished indi­vidu­als fall prey to logic­al fal­la­cies and cog­nit­ive biases so fre­quently. At first, I thought that this meant that I was very clev­er — until I real­ised that I was just as stu­pid as often as they were.

What’s going on here?

To explore think­ing bet­ter, I would like to make an essen­tial distinction:

Intelligence. This meas­ure is based on men­tal capa­city (genet­ics, epi­gen­et­ics, and neuroplasticity).

Clear think­ing. This skill is based on men­tal com­pet­ence (know­ledge, exper­i­ence, and practice).

Using this dis­tinc­tion, we might find that improv­ing men­tal capa­city is chal­len­ging. Your genet­ics are what they are — for bet­ter or worse. Still, inter­est­ing sci­entif­ic insights stem­ming from research on epi­gen­et­ics and neuro­plas­ti­city exist.

There are also dif­fer­ent intel­li­gence types. While you might be weak­er in some intel­lec­tu­al capa­cit­ies, you might be unknow­ingly strong in oth­ers you haven’t yet explored or developed.

As for men­tal com­pet­ence, there are count­less dif­fer­ent ven­ues to invest­ig­ate and learn. You can learn power­ful men­tal mod­els to think bet­ter and faster. You can learn more about dif­fer­ent types of know­ledge and how know­ledge is cre­ated.

You can rid your­self of bad think­ing habits and learn to recog­nise logic­al fal­la­cies and cog­nit­ive biases.

In short:
There are many ways to be smart.

Learn more: Mental Capacity vs Mental Competence

Howard Gardner: 10 Intelligence Types

Howard Gardner’s the­ory of mul­tiple intel­li­gences expands the tra­di­tion­al view of intel­li­gence bey­ond logic­al and lin­guist­ic cap­ab­il­it­ies. ¹Theory of mul­tiple intel­li­gences. (2023, November 28). In Wikipedia. https://​en​.wiki​pe​dia​.org/​w​i​k​i​/​T​h​e​o​r​y​_​o​f​_​m​u​l​t​i​p​l​e​_​i​n​t​e​l​l​i​g​e​n​ces

“Gardner’s the­ory of mul­tiple intel­li­gences has revo­lu­tion­ized edu­ca­tion, chal­len­ging the notion of a single, fixed intel­li­gence and pro­mot­ing a more diverse approach to teach­ing and learn­ing.”
Source: The First Seven…and the Eighth: A Conversation with Howard Gardner ²Checkley, K. (1997). The First Seven…and the Eighth: A Conversation with Howard Gardner. Educational Leadership, 55, 8 – 13.

Here’s a descrip­tion of each type of intel­li­gence as out­lined in his theory:

Each intel­li­gence type rep­res­ents dif­fer­ent ways of pro­cessing inform­a­tion and sug­gests every­one has a unique blend of these bits of intel­li­gence. ⁴Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. Basic Books.

Learn more: 10 Intelligence Types: Howard Gardner’s Theory

Mental Models: Think Better

Mental mod­els emphas­ise the import­ance of view­ing prob­lems from mul­tiple per­spect­ives, recog­nising per­son­al lim­it­a­tions, and under­stand­ing the often unfore­seen inter­ac­tions between dif­fer­ent factors. 

The writ­ings of Charlie Munger, Vice Chairman of Berkshire Hathaway and long-time col­lab­or­at­or of Warren Buffett and many oth­ers, inspire sev­er­al of the below mod­els.⁵It’s worth not­ing that these mod­els are not exclus­ively Charlie Munger’s inven­tions but tools he advoc­ates for effect­ive think­ing and decision-mak­ing.

List of Mental Models

Here’s a list of my favour­ite men­tal models: 

The iron pre­scrip­tion (men­tal mod­el). Senior advisor Charlie Munger argued: “I have what I call an ‘iron pre­scrip­tion’ that helps me keep sane when I nat­ur­ally drift toward pre­fer­ring one ideo­logy over anoth­er. I feel that I’m not entitled to have an opin­ion unless I can state the argu­ments against my pos­i­tion bet­ter than the people who are in oppos­i­tion. I think that I am qual­i­fied to speak only when I’ve reached that state” (Knodell, 2016). ⁶Knodell, P. A. (2016). All I want to know is where I’m going to die so I’ll nev­er go there: Buffett & Munger – A study in sim­pli­city and uncom­mon, com­mon sense. PAK Publishing.

The Red Queen effect (men­tal mod­el). This meta­phor ori­gin­ates from Lewis Carroll’s Through the Looking-Glass. It describes a situ­ation in which one must con­tinu­ously adapt, evolve, and work to main­tain one’s pos­i­tion. In the story, the Red Queen is a char­ac­ter who explains to Alice that in their world, run­ning as fast as one can is neces­sary just to stay in the same place. The meta­phor is often used in the con­text of busi­nesses that need to innov­ate con­stantly to stay com­pet­it­ive, high­light­ing the relent­less pres­sure to adapt in dynam­ic envir­on­ments where stag­na­tion can mean fall­ing behind. ⁷Red Queen hypo­thes­is. (2023, November 27). In Wikipedia. https://​en​.wiki​pe​dia​.org/​w​i​k​i​/​R​e​d​_​Q​u​e​e​n​_​h​y​p​o​t​h​e​sis ⁸Carroll, L. (2006). Through the look­ing-glass, and what Alice found there (R. D. Martin, Ed.). Penguin Classics. (Original work pub­lished 1871.)

Ockam’s razor (men­tal mod­el). This prin­ciple sug­gests that the simplest explan­a­tion is usu­ally cor­rect. The one with the few­est assump­tions should be selec­ted when presen­ted with com­pet­ing hypo­theses. It’s a tool for cut­ting through com­plex­ity and focus­ing on what’s most likely true. ⁹Ariew, R. (1976). Ockham’s Razor: A his­tor­ic­al and philo­soph­ic­al ana­lys­is of sim­pli­city in sci­ence. Scientific American, 234(3), 88 – 93.

Hanlon’s razor (men­tal mod­el). This think­ing aid advises against attrib­ut­ing to malice what can be adequately explained by incom­pet­ence or mis­take. It reminds us to look for more straight­for­ward explan­a­tions before jump­ing to con­clu­sions about someone’s inten­tions. ¹⁰Hanlon, R. J. (1980). Murphy’s Law book two: More reas­ons why things go wrong!. Los Angeles: Price Stern Sloan.

Vaguely right vs pre­cisely wrong (men­tal mod­el). This prin­ciple sug­gests it is bet­ter to be approx­im­ately cor­rect than 100% incor­rect. In many situ­ations, seek­ing pre­ci­sion can lead to errors if the under­ly­ing assump­tions or data are flawed. Sometimes, a rough estim­ate is more valu­able than a pre­cise but poten­tially mis­lead­ing fig­ure. ¹¹Keynes, J. M. (1936). The gen­er­al the­ory of employ­ment, interest, and money. London: Macmillan.

Fat pitch (men­tal mod­el). Borrowed from base­ball, this concept refers to wait­ing patiently for the per­fect oppor­tun­ity — a situ­ation where the chances of suc­cess are excep­tion­ally high. It sug­gests the import­ance of patience and strik­ing when the time is right. ¹²Kaufman, P. A. (Ed.). (2005). Poor Charlie’s alman­ack: The wit and wis­dom of Charles T. Munger. Virginia Beach, VA: Donning Company Publishers.

Chesterton’s fence (men­tal mod­el). G.K. Chesterton: ”In the mat­ter of reform­ing things, as dis­tinct from deform­ing them, there is one plain and simple prin­ciple; a prin­ciple which will prob­ably be called a para­dox. There exists in such a case a cer­tain insti­tu­tion or law; let us say, for the sake of sim­pli­city, a fence or gate erec­ted across a road. The more mod­ern type of reformer goes gaily up to it and says, ‘I don’t see the use of this; let us clear it away.’ To which the more intel­li­gent type of reformer will do well to answer: ‘If you don’t see the use of it, I cer­tainly won’t let you clear it away. Go away and think. Then, when you can come back and tell me that you do see the use of it, I may allow you to des­troy it” (Chesterton, 1929). ¹³Chesterton, G. K. (1929). “The Drift from Domesticity”. Archived 6 November 2018 at the Wayback Machine In: The Thing. London: Sheed & Ward, p. 35

First-con­clu­sion bias (men­tal mod­el). This is the tend­ency to stick with the first con­clu­sion without con­sid­er­ing altern­at­ive pos­sib­il­it­ies or addi­tion­al inform­a­tion. It’s a cog­nit­ive bias that can impede crit­ic­al think­ing and thor­ough analysis.

First prin­ciples think­ing (men­tal mod­el). This approach involves break­ing down com­plex prob­lems into their most basic ele­ments and then reas­sembling them from the ground up. It’s about get­ting to the fun­da­ment­al truths of a situ­ation and build­ing your under­stand­ing from there rather than rely­ing on assump­tions or con­ven­tion­al wisdom.

The map is not the ter­rit­ory (men­tal mod­el). This mod­el reminds us that rep­res­ent­a­tions of real­ity are not real­ity itself. Maps, mod­els, and descrip­tions are sim­pli­fic­a­tions and can­not cap­ture every aspect of the actu­al ter­rit­ory or situ­ation. It’s a cau­tion against over-rely­ing on mod­els and the­or­ies without con­sid­er­ing the nuances of real-world situ­ations. ¹⁴Silfwer, J. (2022, November 3). Walter Lippmann: Public Opinion and Perception Management. Doctor Spin | The PR Blog. https://​doc​tor​spin​.net/​w​a​l​t​e​r​-​l​i​p​p​m​a​nn/

Bell curve (men­tal mod­el). This curve is a graph­ic­al depic­tion of a nor­mal dis­tri­bu­tion, show­ing how many occur­rences fall near the mean value and few­er occur as you move away from the mean. In decision-mak­ing, it’s used to under­stand and anti­cip­ate vari­ab­il­ity and to recog­nise that while extreme cases exist, most out­comes will cluster around the average.

Compounding (men­tal mod­el). Often used in the con­text of fin­ance, com­pound­ing refers to the pro­cess where the value of an invest­ment increases because the earn­ings on an invest­ment, both cap­it­al gains and interest, earn interest as time passes. This prin­ciple can be applied more broadly to under­stand how small, con­sist­ent efforts can yield sig­ni­fic­ant long-term results.

Survival of the fit­test (men­tal mod­el). Borrowed from evol­u­tion­ary bio­logy, this men­tal mod­el sug­gests that only those best adap­ted to their envir­on­ment sur­vive and thrive. In a busi­ness con­text, it can refer to com­pan­ies that adapt to chan­ging mar­ket con­di­tions and are more likely to succeed.

Mr. Market (men­tal mod­el). A meta­phor cre­ated by Benjamin Graham rep­res­ents the stock mar­ket’s mood swings from optim­ism to pess­im­ism. It’s used to illus­trate emo­tion­al reac­tions in the mar­ket and the import­ance of main­tain­ing objectiv­ity. ¹⁵Graham, B. (2006). The intel­li­gent investor: The defin­it­ive book on value invest­ing (Rev. ed., updated with new com­ment­ary by J. Zweig). Harper Business. (Original work pub­lished 1949.)

Second-order think­ing (men­tal mod­el). This kind of think­ing goes bey­ond the imme­di­ate effects of an action to con­sider the sub­sequent effects. It’s about think­ing ahead and under­stand­ing the longer-term con­sequences of decisions bey­ond just the imme­di­ate results.

Law of dimin­ish­ing returns (men­tal mod­el). This eco­nom­ic prin­ciple states that as invest­ment in a par­tic­u­lar area increases, the rate of profit from that invest­ment, after a cer­tain point, can­not increase pro­por­tion­ally and may even decrease. It’s essen­tial to under­stand when addi­tion­al invest­ment yields pro­gress­ively smal­ler returns. ¹⁶Diminishing returns. (2024, November 15). Wikipedia. https://​en​.wiki​pe​dia​.org/​w​i​k​i​/​D​i​m​i​n​i​s​h​i​n​g​_​r​e​t​u​rns

Opportunity cost (men­tal mod­el). This concept refers to the poten­tial bene­fits one misses out on when choos­ing one altern­at­ive over anoth­er. It’s the cost of the fol­low­ing best option fore­gone. Understanding oppor­tun­ity costs helps make informed decisions by con­sid­er­ing what to give up when choosing.

Swiss Army knife approach (men­tal mod­el). This concept emphas­ises the import­ance of hav­ing diverse tools (or skills). Being ver­sat­ile and adapt­able in vari­ous situ­ations is valu­able, like a Swiss Army knife. This mod­el is bene­fi­cial for uncer­tain and volat­ile situ­ations. There’s also a case to be made for gen­er­al­ists in a spe­cial­ised world. ¹⁷Parsons, M., & Pearson-Freeland, M. (Hosts). (2021, August 8). Charlie Munger: Latticework of men­tal mod­els (No. 139) [Audio pod­cast epis­ode]. In Moonshots pod­cast: Learning out … Continue read­ing ¹⁸Epstein, D. (2019). Range: Why gen­er­al­ists tri­umph in a spe­cial­ized world. Riverhead Books.

Acceleration the­ory (men­tal mod­el). This concept indic­ates that the win­ner mustn’t lead the race from start to fin­ish. Mathematically, delay­ing max­im­um “speed” by pro­long­ing the slower accel­er­a­tion phase will get you across the fin­ish line faster. ¹⁹Silfwer, J. (2012, October 31). The Acceleration Theory: Use Momentum To Finish First. Doctor Spin | The PR Blog. https://​doc​tor​spin​.net/​a​c​c​e​l​e​r​a​t​i​o​n​-​t​h​e​o​ry/

Manage expect­a­tions (men­tal mod­el). This concept involves set­ting real­ist­ic expect­a­tions for your­self and oth­ers. It’s about align­ing hopes and pre­dic­tions with what is achiev­able and prob­able, thus redu­cing dis­ap­point­ment and increas­ing sat­is­fac­tion. Effective expect­a­tion man­age­ment can lead to bet­ter per­son­al and pro­fes­sion­al rela­tion­ships and outcomes.

Techlash (men­tal mod­el). This men­tal mod­el acknow­ledges that while tech­no­logy can provide solu­tions, it almost always cre­ates fore­seen and unfore­seen prob­lems. It’s a remind­er to approach tech­no­lo­gic­al innov­a­tions cau­tiously, con­sid­er­ing poten­tial neg­at­ive impacts along­side the bene­fits. ²⁰Silfwer, J. (2018, December 27). The Techlash: Our Great Confusion. Doctor Spin | The PR Blog. https://​doc​tor​spin​.net/​t​e​c​h​l​a​sh/

World’s most intel­li­gent ques­tion (men­tal mod­el). This men­tal mod­el refers to repeatedly ask­ing “Why?” to delve deep­er into a prob­lem and under­stand its root causes. By con­tinu­ally ask­ing why some­thing hap­pens, one can uncov­er lay­ers of under­stand­ing that might remain hidden.

Regression to the mean (men­tal mod­el). This stat­ist­ic­al prin­ciple states that extreme events are likely to be fol­lowed by more mod­er­ate ones. Over time, val­ues tend to revert to the aver­age, a concept rel­ev­ant in many areas, from sports per­form­ance to busi­ness metrics.

False dicho­tomy (men­tal mod­el). This logic­al fal­lacy occurs when a situ­ation is presen­ted as hav­ing only two exclus­ive and mutu­ally exhaust­ive options when oth­er pos­sib­il­it­ies exist. It over­sim­pli­fies com­plex issues into an “either/​or” choice. For instance, say­ing, “You are either with us or against us,” ignores the pos­sib­il­ity of neut­ral or altern­at­ive positions.

Inversion (men­tal mod­el). Inversion involves look­ing at prob­lems back­wards or from the end goal. Instead of think­ing about how to achieve some­thing, you con­sider what would pre­vent it from hap­pen­ing. This can reveal hid­den obstacles and altern­at­ive solutions.

Psychology of human mis­judg­ment (men­tal mod­el). This men­tal mod­el refers to under­stand­ing the typ­ic­al biases and errors in human think­ing. One can make more ration­al and object­ive decisions by know­ing how cog­nit­ive biases, like con­firm­a­tion bias or the anchor­ing effect, can lead to flawed reasoning.

Slow is smooth, smooth is fast (men­tal mod­el). — Often used in mil­it­ary and tac­tic­al train­ing, this phrase encap­su­lates the idea that some­times, slow­ing down can lead to faster over­all pro­gress. The prin­ciple is that tak­ing delib­er­ate, con­sidered actions reduces mis­takes and inef­fi­cien­cies, which can lead to faster out­comes in the long run. In prac­tice, it means plan­ning, train­ing, and execut­ing with care, lead­ing to smooth­er, more effi­cient oper­a­tions that achieve object­ives faster than rushed, less thought­ful efforts. ²¹Silfwer, J. (2020, April 24). Slow is Smooth, Smooth is Fast. Doctor Spin | The PR Blog. https://​doc​tor​spin​.net/​s​l​o​w​-​i​s​-​s​m​o​o​th/

Because you are worth it (men­tal mod­el). This men­tal mod­el focuses on self-worth and invest­ing in one­self. It sug­gests recog­nising and affirm­ing one’s value is cru­cial for per­son­al growth, hap­pi­ness, and suc­cess. This can involve self-care, edu­ca­tion, or simply mak­ing choices that reflect one’s value and potential.

Physics envy (men­tal mod­el). This term describes the desire to apply the pre­ci­sion and cer­tainty of phys­ics to fields where such exactitude is impossible, like eco­nom­ics or social sci­ences. It’s a cau­tion against over­re­li­ance on quant­it­at­ive meth­ods in areas where qual­it­at­ive aspects play a sig­ni­fic­ant role.

Easy street strategy (men­tal mod­el). This prin­ciple sug­gests that sim­pler solu­tions are often bet­ter and more effect­ive than com­plex ones. In decision-mak­ing and prob­lem-solv­ing, seek­ing straight­for­ward, clear-cut solu­tions can often lead to bet­ter out­comes than pur­su­ing overly com­plic­ated strategies. ²²Silfwer, J. (2021, January 27). The Easy Street PR Strategy: Keep It Simple To Win. Doctor Spin | The PR Blog. https://​doc​tor​spin​.net/​e​a​s​y​-​s​t​r​e​e​t​-​p​r​-​s​t​r​a​t​e​gy/

Scale is key (men­tal mod­el). This concept high­lights how the impact of decisions or actions can vary dra­mat­ic­ally depend­ing on their scale. What works well on a small scale might not be prac­tic­al or feas­ible on a lar­ger scale, and vice versa.

Circle of com­pet­ence (men­tal mod­el). This concept involves recog­nising and under­stand­ing one’s areas of expert­ise and lim­it­a­tions. The idea is to focus on areas where you have the most know­ledge and exper­i­ence rather than ven­tur­ing into fields where you lack expert­ise, thereby increas­ing the like­li­hood of success.

Fail fast, fail often (men­tal mod­el). By fail­ing fast, you quickly learn what does­n’t work, which helps in refin­ing your approach or pivot­ing to some­thing more prom­ising. Failing often is seen not as a series of set­backs but as a neces­sary part of the pro­cess towards suc­cess. This mind­set encour­ages exper­i­ment­a­tion, risk-tak­ing, and learn­ing from mis­takes, emphas­ising agil­ity and adaptability.

Correlation does not equal caus­a­tion (men­tal mod­el). This prin­ciple is a crit­ic­al remind­er in data ana­lys­is and sci­entif­ic research. Just because two vari­ables show a cor­rel­a­tion (they seem to move togeth­er or oppose each oth­er) does not mean one causes the oth­er. Other vari­ables could be at play, or it might be a coincidence.

Critical mass (men­tal mod­el). This men­tal mod­el emphas­ises the import­ance of reach­ing a cer­tain threshold to trig­ger a sig­ni­fic­ant change, wheth­er user adop­tion, mar­ket pen­et­ra­tion, or social move­ment growth. This mod­el guides stra­tegic decisions, such as resource alloc­a­tion, mar­ket­ing strategies, and tim­ing of ini­ti­at­ives, to effect­ively reach and sur­pass this cru­cial point. ²³Silfwer, J. (2019, March 10). Critical Mass: How Many Social Media Followers Do You Need? Doctor Spin | The PR Blog. https://​doc​tor​spin​.net/​c​r​i​t​i​c​a​l​-​m​a​s​s​-​f​o​l​l​o​w​e​rs/

Sorites para­dox (men­tal mod­el). Also known as the para­dox of the heap, this para­dox arises from vague pre­dic­ates. It involves a sequence of small changes that don’t seem to make a dif­fer­ence indi­vidu­ally but, when accu­mu­lated, lead to a sig­ni­fic­ant change where the exact point of change is indis­cern­ible. For example, if you keep remov­ing grains of sand from a heap, when does it stop being a heap? Each grain does­n’t seem to make a dif­fer­ence, but even­tu­ally, you’re left with no heap.

The power of cycle times (men­tal mod­el). Mathematically, redu­cing cycle times in a pro­cess that grows expo­nen­tially (like con­tent shar­ing on social net­works) drastic­ally increases the growth rate, lead­ing to faster and broad­er dis­sem­in­a­tion of the con­tent, thereby driv­ing vir­al­ity. The com­bin­a­tion of expo­nen­tial growth, net­work effects, and feed­back loops makes cycle time a crit­ic­al factor. ²⁴Let’s say the num­ber of new social media shares per cycle is a con­stant mul­ti­pli­er, m. If the cycle time is t and the total time under con­sid­er­a­tion is T, the num­ber of cycles in this time is T/​t​. … Continue read­ing ²⁵Silfwer, J. (2017, February 6). Viral Loops (or How to Incentivise Social Media Sharing). Doctor Spin | the PR Blog. https://​doc​tor​spin​.net/​v​i​r​a​l​-​l​o​op/

Non-lin­ear­ity (men­tal mod­el). This men­tal mod­el recog­nises that out­comes in many situ­ations are not dir­ectly pro­por­tion­al to the inputs or efforts. It sug­gests that effects can be dis­pro­por­tion­ate to their causes, either escal­at­ing rap­idly with minor changes or remain­ing stag­nant des­pite sig­ni­fic­ant efforts. Understanding non-lin­ear­ity helps in recog­nising and anti­cip­at­ing com­plex pat­terns in vari­ous phenomena.

Checklists (men­tal mod­el). This men­tal mod­el stresses the import­ance of sys­tem­at­ic approaches to pre­vent mis­takes and over­sights. Using check­lists in com­plex or repet­it­ive tasks ensures that all neces­sary steps are fol­lowed and noth­ing is over­looked, thereby increas­ing effi­ciency and accur­acy. ²⁶Silfwer, J. (2020, September 18). Communicative Leadership in Organisations. Doctor Spin | The PR Blog. https://​doc​tor​spin​.net/​c​o​m​m​u​n​i​c​a​t​i​v​e​-​l​e​a​d​e​r​s​h​ip/

Lollapalooza (men­tal mod­el). Coined by Munger, this term refers to situ­ations where mul­tiple factors, tend­en­cies, or biases inter­act so that the com­bined effect is much great­er than the sum of indi­vidu­al effects. It’s a remind­er of how vari­ous ele­ments can con­verge to cre­ate sig­ni­fic­ant impacts, often unex­pec­ted or unprecedented.

Limits (men­tal mod­el). This men­tal mod­el acknow­ledges that everything has bound­ar­ies or lim­its, bey­ond which there can be neg­at­ive con­sequences. Recognising and respect­ing per­son­al, pro­fes­sion­al, and phys­ic­al lim­its is essen­tial for sus­tain­able growth and suc­cess. In the words of “Dirty Harry” Callahan, “A man’s got to know his limitations.”

The 7Ws (men­tal mod­el). This men­tal mod­el refers to the prac­tice of ask­ing “Who, What, When, Where, Why” (and some­times “How”) to under­stand a situ­ation or prob­lem fully. By sys­tem­at­ic­ally address­ing these ques­tions, one can com­pre­hens­ively under­stand an issue’s con­text, causes, and poten­tial solu­tions, lead­ing to more informed decision-mak­ing. ²⁷Silfwer, J. (2020, September 18). The Checklist for Communicative Organisations. Doctor Spin | The PR Blog. https://​doc​tor​spin​.net/​c​h​e​c​k​l​i​s​t​-​f​o​r​-​c​o​m​m​u​n​i​c​a​t​i​v​e​-​l​e​a​d​e​r​s​h​ip/

Chauffeur know­ledge (men­tal mod­el). This men­tal mod­el dis­tin­guishes between hav­ing a sur­face-level under­stand­ing (like a chauf­feur who knows the route) and deep, genu­ine know­ledge (like an expert who under­stands the intric­a­cies of a sub­ject). It warns against the illu­sion of expert­ise based on super­fi­cial know­ledge and emphas­ises the import­ance of accur­ate, deep understanding.

Make friends with emin­ent dead (men­tal mod­el). This men­tal mod­el advoc­ates learn­ing from the past, par­tic­u­larly from sig­ni­fic­ant his­tor­ic­al fig­ures and their writ­ings. Studying the exper­i­ences and thoughts of those who have excelled in their fields can yield valu­able insights and wisdom.

Seizing the middle (men­tal mod­el). This strategy involves find­ing and main­tain­ing a bal­anced, mod­er­ate pos­i­tion, espe­cially in con­flict or nego­ti­ation. It’s about avoid­ing extremes and find­ing a sus­tain­able, middle-ground solu­tion. Also, centre pos­i­tions often offer the broad­est range of options.

Asymmetric war­fare (men­tal mod­el). This refers to con­flict between parties of unequal strength, where the weak­er party uses uncon­ven­tion­al tac­tics to exploit the vul­ner­ab­il­it­ies of the stronger oppon­ent. It’s often dis­cussed in mil­it­ary and busi­ness contexts.

Boredom syn­drome (men­tal mod­el). This term refers to the human tend­ency to seek stim­u­la­tion or change when things become routine or mono­ton­ous, which can lead to unne­ces­sary changes or risks. Sometimes, tak­ing no action is bet­ter than tak­ing action, but remain­ing idle can be difficult.

Survivorship bias (men­tal mod­el). This cog­nit­ive bias involves focus­ing on people or things that have “sur­vived” some pro­cess and inad­vert­ently over­look­ing those that did not due to their lack of vis­ib­il­ity. This can lead to false con­clu­sions because it ignores the exper­i­ences of those who did not make it through the pro­cess. ²⁸Silfwer, J. (2019, October 17). Survivorship Bias. Doctor Spin | The PR Blog. https://​doc​tor​spin​.net/​s​u​r​v​i​v​o​r​s​h​i​p​-​b​i​as/

Each men­tal mod­el offers a lens for view­ing prob­lems, mak­ing decisions, and strategising, reflect­ing the com­plex­ity and diversity of thought required in vari­ous fields and situations.

Numerous oth­er men­tal mod­els are also used in vari­ous fields, such as eco­nom­ics, psy­cho­logy, and sys­tems thinking.

Learn more: Mental Models: How To Think Better

How To Create Knowledge

This list of how to cre­ate know­ledge presents aspects of reas­on­ing, meth­od­o­lo­gic­al approaches, data ana­lys­is per­spect­ives, and philo­soph­ic­al frame­works. It explains how know­ledge can be approached, ana­lysed, and interpreted.

Types of Reasoning and Logical Processes

Methodological Approaches

Data and Analysis Perspectives

Philosophical and Theoretical Frameworks

Learn more: How To Create Knowledge

Types of Bad Thinking Habits

Underpinning most of our think­ing mis­takes, some psy­cho­lo­gic­ally induced think­ing habits seem to affect our abil­ity to think clearly. Understanding (and avoid­ing) these beha­vi­our­al pat­terns should allow for clear thinking.

Understanding these dif­fer­ent types of think­ing can help identi­fy and address cog­nit­ive fal­la­cies and biases in decision-mak­ing and prob­lem-solv­ing processes.

Learn more: Types of Bad Thinking Habits
Learn more: Logical Fallacies and Cognitive Biases

List of Logical Fallacies and Biases

We eas­ily fall prey to the tricks our psy­cho­logy plays on us. These “think­ing errors” exist because they’ve often aided our sur­viv­al. However, know­ing and under­stand­ing vari­ous types of com­mon fal­la­cies and biases is help­ful in every­day life.

Here are a few examples of logic­al fal­la­cies and biases that I’ve come across while study­ing pub­lic rela­tions and linguistics:

Learn more: 58 Logical Fallacies and Biases

What should you study next?