Doctor SpinThe PR BlogManaging Social MediaThe Social Media Complaint Department

The Social Media Complaint Department

Take a number.

Cover photo: @jerrysilfwer

Welcome to the social media com­plaint department.

Oh, haven’t you heard?

Social media algorithms are divis­ive and make us hate ourselves — and each other.

Oh, and excess­ive screen time is des­troy­ing our youth. It’s all a glob­al Pavlovian exper­i­ment on our online brains.

Don’t for­get that Mark Zuckerberg is a robot.

Meanwhile, they’re all spy­ing on us.

Bob Sullivan, author and journalist

So what’s the Original Sin of the Internet? Nearly all busi­ness mod­els it sup­ports require spy­ing on con­sumers and mon­et­ising them.”

Sure, I get it. I’m not dis­put­ing that some cri­ti­cisms are highly rel­ev­ant. (Except per­haps for that part about The Zuck. It’s not evid­ent that he is a mighty AI over­lord — yet.)

For bet­ter or worse — wel­come to the internet.

Bruno Gianelli on racing sailboats in The West Wing - For Content

When I star­ted my PR career in 2005, I res­isted my intro­ver­ted nature. I pro­claimed my mes­sage from the bar­ri­cades to any­one will­ing to listen: our soci­ety’s digit­al­isa­tion isn’t some­thing the PR industry can ignore.

The days of the hip­pie web are long gone, but there was a time when digit­al-first was not appar­ent to everyone.

As a res­ult, many of my busi­ness acquaint­ances are sur­prised when they hear me dis­cuss social media from a crit­ic­al per­spect­ive. “Wait, Jerry, I thought you loved everything digital?!”

To be clear, I’m not blam­ing any­one but myself for mani­fest­ing this gen­er­al per­cep­tion. I did tell hun­dreds of organ­isa­tions to adapt to digit­al-first. My mes­sage was­n’t gentle; I gave them an ulti­mat­um — adapt or die.

Does this mean that I love everything about social media? Does this mean that I love algorithms and fil­ter bubbles? Does this mean that I love … the Zuck-bot?

I’m still a PR pro­fes­sion­al, goddammit.

My job is to help organ­isa­tions nego­ti­ate vari­ous media chan­nels and to pro­tect them when the media gets things wrong (which still hap­pens all the time, by the way).

Case in point: I think journ­al­ism is essen­tial for demo­cracy, but that does­n’t mean journ­al­ists always get things right. They don’t.

It’s not ration­al to con­vince your­self that journ­al­ists are either saints or sin­ners. Clinging to such simplist­ic dicho­tom­ies is a poor busi­ness mindset.

So, why con­vince your­self that social media must be altru­ist­ic or mali­cious? That, too, is a poor busi­ness mind­set. It’s just your per­son­al bias on the mat­ter get­ting in the way.

Do social media algorithms make you feel bad about your­self? Does most of the con­tent you’re exposed to seem point­less or dumb? Is no one inter­ested in the con­tent you share?

Don’t get mad.
Get smarter.
And skip the drama, please.

I don’t love it when journ­al­ists get things wrong.
I don’t love it when social media gets things wrong.

I’m only advising organ­isa­tions to stop com­plain­ing and deal with whatever is in front of them. I was back then, and I am now.

I’m advoc­at­ing a bal­anced view. Because the inter­net isn’t going anywhere.

I think of Jan Stenbeck (1942 – 2002), the legendary Swedish entre­pren­eur. His busi­ness philo­sophy, as described by bio­graphy author Per Andersson, can be summed up: 1Jan Stenbeck. (2023, December 26). In Wikipedia. https://​en​.wiki​pe​dia​.org/​w​i​k​i​/​J​a​n​_​S​t​e​n​b​eck 2Per Andersson (journ­al­ist). (2024, January 10). In Wikipedia. https://​sv​.wiki​pe​dia​.org/​w​i​k​i​/​P​e​r​_​A​n​d​e​r​s​s​o​n​_​(​j​o​u​r​n​a​l​ist)

  • Ideas are powerful.
  • However, money beats ideas.
  • But then, polit­ics beats money.
  • Ultimately, tech­no­logy beats politics.

Because guess what? 

The play­ing field is the same for every­one. There are going to be win­ners and losers. Some will fig­ure things out, and some won’t. Information tech­no­logy is a rising tide, and while it’s not a law of nature, it’s a law of mod­ern civilisation.

Contrary to pop­u­lar belief, it’s not evid­ent that Facebook, TikTok, or any social net­work is try­ing to enslave our minds or mould us into pass­ive, mind­less consumers. 

Mostly, they’re just try­ing to show us ads.

Old-school politi­cians struggle to grasp social media. I can still hear the echo of Mark Zuckerberg’s words, “Senator, we run ads.”

So, the prob­lem isn’t that these social net­works are evil. A con­trari­an ana­lys­is would sug­gest that social net­works are highly effi­cient ser­vice pro­viders. The prob­lem is that they’re too good at what they do. 

This is also what I tell friends and fam­ily who feel like “algorithm vic­tims.” And what I tell par­ents who hate their chil­dren’s smart­phones, pads, and gam­ing stations.

Stop com­plain­ing and get busy win­ning instead.


Thanks for read­ing. Need a PR spe­cial­ist?
Please con­tact Jerry for a consultation.

What should you study next?

Jerry Silfwer
Jerry Silfwerhttps://doctorspin.net/
Jerry Silfwer, alias Doctor Spin, is an awarded senior adviser specialising in public relations and digital strategy. Currently CEO at Spin Factory and KIX Communication Index. Before that, he worked at Whispr Group NYC, Springtime PR, and Spotlight PR. Based in Stockholm, Sweden.

The Cover Photo

The cover photo isn't related to public relations obviously; it's just a photo of mine. Think of it as a 'decorative diversion', a subtle reminder that it's good to have hobbies outside work.

The cover photo has

.

Subscribe to SpinCTRL—it’s 100% free!

Join 2,550+ fellow PR lovers and subscribe to Jerry’s free newsletter on communication and psychology.
What will you get?

> PR commentary on current events.
> Subscriber-only VIP content.
> My personal PR slides for .key and .ppt.
> Discounts on upcoming PR courses.
> Ebook on getting better PR ideas.
Subscribe to SpinCTRL today by clicking SUBSCRIBE and get your first free send-out instantly.

Latest Posts
Similar Posts
Most Popular