Have you idenยญtiยญfied your stuยญpid majorยญity yet?
The story of the preยญvailยญing underยญdog seems to be as old as humanยญity itself. The underยญdog strategy is also impactยญful in pubยญlic relaยญtions (PR).
As a PR advisor since 2005, Iโve helped many brands side with a Smart Minority in the fight against a Stupid Majorityโโโoften with specยญtacยญuยญlar results.
This blog artยญicle will outยญline how this underยญdog PR strategy works.
Here we go:
The Stupid Majority PR Strategy
From what the conยญverยญsion theยญory teaches us, minorยญitยญies tend to hold their opinยญions more firmly. This is reasยญonยญable since going against the majorยญity comes at a highยญer social cost. 1Silfwer, J. (2017, June 13). Conversion TheoryโโโDisproportionate Minority Influence. Doctor Spin | The PR Blog. https://โdocโtorโspinโ.net/โcโoโnโvโeโrโsโiโoโnโ-โtโhโeโoโry/
But some minorยญitยญies have an addiยญtionยญal advantage:
Smart minorยญity = a minorยญity of today that will grow into a new majorยญity of tomorrow.
In conยญtrast, some majorยญitยญies have an addiยญtionยญal disadvantage:
Stupid majorยญity = a majorยญity of today that will steadยญily decline into a minorยญity of tomorrow.
Identifying a stuยญpid majorยญity (and sidยญing with a smart minorยญity) will claยญriยญfy your core mesยญsage and attract highly engaged minorยญity supporters.
Examples of Stupid Majorities
Stupid majorยญitยญies are to be found everywhere:
Now, hereโs the 1,000,000 EUR question:
Whatโs a stuยญpid majorยญity in your industry?
Challenging a Stupid Majority
Stupid majorยญitยญies exist in your industry, too.
And now that you know what to look for, youโll soon start findยญing them everywhere.
The stuยญpid majorยญity PR strategy could resยญult in the most proยญfound resยญults of your pubยญlic relaยญtions career:
Read also: The Stupid Majority PR Strategy
The Conversion Theory
The social psyยญchoยญloยญgist Serge Moscovici found that we become more engaged if we belong to a misยญrepยญresยญenยญted minorยญity.
The disยญproยญporยญtionยญal power of minorยญitยญies is known as the conยญverยญsion theยญory. 2Conversion theยญory of minorยญity influยญence. (2021, February 12). In Wikipedia. https://โenโ.wikiโpeโdiaโ.org/โwโiโkโiโ/โCโoโnโvโeโrโsโiโoโnโ_โtโhโeโoโrโyโ_โoโfโ_โmโiโnโoโrโiโtโyโ_โiโnโfโlโuโeโnce
โIn groups, the minorยญity can have a disยญproยญporยญtionยญate effect, conยญvertยญing many โmajorยญityโ memยญbers to their own cause. This is because many majorยญity group memยญbers are not strong believยญers in its cause. They may be simply going along because it seems easiยญer or that there is no real alternยญatยญive. They may also have become disยญilยญluยญsioned with the group purยญpose, proยญcess, or leadยญerยญship and are seekยญing a viable alternยญatยญive.โ
Source: Changingmindsโ.org 3Conversion Theory. (2023). Changingmindsโ.org. https://โchanโgingโmindsโ.org/โeโxโpโlโaโnโaโtโiโoโnโsโ/โtโhโeโoโrโiโeโsโ/โcโoโnโvโeโrโsโiโoโnโ_โtโhโeโoโrโyโ.โhtm
How does it work?
The social cost of holdยญing a difยญferยญent view than the majorยญity is high. This increased cost explains why minorยญitยญies often hold their opinยญions more firmly. It takes determยญinยญaยญtion to go against the norm. 4Moscovici, S. (1980). Toward a theยญory of conยญverยญsion behaยญviour. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 209โโโ239. New York: Academic Press
In conยญtrast, many majorยญity memยญbers donโt hold their opinยญions so firmly. They might belong to the majorยญity for no othยญer reasยญon than that everyยญone else seems to be. 5Chryssochoou, X. and Volpato, C. (2004). Social Influence and the Power of Minorities: An Analysis of the Communist Manifesto, Social Justice Research, 17, 4, 357โโโ388
According to conยญverยญsion theยญory, while majorยญitยญies often claim normยญatยญive social influยญence, minorยญitยญies strive for ethยญicยญal high ground.
Conversion Theory Examples
Given the power of normยญatยญive social influยญence, minorยญitยญies typยญicยญally form tight-knit groups that can gathยญer around a core mesยญsage.
Most big shifts usuยญally start with a small group of dedยญicยญated people:
Minority Influence: A PR Approach
Organisations with CSR aspirยญaยญtions can culยญtivยญate a sense of purยญpose and accomยญplishยญment among parยญtiยญcipants by alignยญing with a moveยญment that chalยญlenges a stuยญpid majority.
Since we tend to favour underยญdogs, liaisยญing with a careยญfully selecยญted minorยญity can be a game-chanยญging PR strategy.
Minority spokesยญperยญsons with solยญid conยญvicยญtions often posยญsess valuยญable knowยญledge and authorยญity, enhanยญcing their perยญsuasยญive abilยญitยญies and influence.
Disproportionately, minorยญitยญies can conยญvert numerยญous majorยญity memยญbers to their cause, as many in the majorยญity may have merely folยญlowed the path of least resยญistยญance, made decisions without much conยญsidยญerยญaยญtion, or lacked viable alternatives.
Additionally, a sigยญniยญficยญant segยญment of the majorยญity might be disยญilยญluยญsioned with their groupโs purยญpose, proยญcess, or leadยญerยญship, renยญderยญing them more receptยญive to alternยญatยญive proposals.
Proceed With Caution, Please
As PR proยญfesยญsionยญals, we must be cauยญtious when impleยญmentยญing the conยญverยญsion theory.
Minorities arenโt always right, and majorยญitยญies arenโt always wrong. Minorities can hold futile views while still exerยญcising a disยญproยญporยญtionยญate amount of power.
Learn more: Conversion Theory: The Disproportionate Influence of Minorities
Diffusion of Innovations
The difยญfuยญsion of innovยญaยญtions theยญory, proยญposed by Everett Rogers in 1962, remains a frameยญwork for underยญstandยญing how new ideas, techยญnoยญloยญgies, products, or pracยญtices spread through sociยญetยญies over time. 6Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
The difยญfuยญsion of innovยญaยญtions theยญory outยญlines the proยญcess by which innovยญaยญtions are adopยญted by indiยญviduยญals and groups, emphasยญising the role of comยญmuยญnicยญaยญtion chanยญnels, social netยญworks, and the charยญacยญterยญistยญics of the innovยญaยญtion itself.
The difยญfuยญsion of innovยญaยญtions theยญory offers insights into how new ideas and techยญnoยญloยญgies influยญence sociยญetยญies. Understanding these dynamยญics can inform pubยญlic relaยญtions strategies across diverse contexts.
โDiffusion research has helped underยญstand new product adopยญtion and difยญfuยญsion, with netยญwork anaยญlysยญis and field experยญiยญments being promยญising tools in underยญstandยญing the conยญsumpยญtion of new products.โ
Source: Journal of Consumer Research 7Rogers, E. (1976). New Product Adoption and Diffusion. Journal of Consumer Research, 2, 290โโโ301. https://โdoiโ.org/โ1โ0โ.โ1โ0โ8โ6โ/โ2โ0โ8โ642
Examples of Technological Adoptions
By examinยญing real-life examples, we can betยญter comยญpreยญhend the prinยญciples of this theยญory and its applicยญaยญtions in variยญous fields:
Learn more: Diffusion of Innovations
The Underdog Story: David and Goliath
We know the story:
The story of David and Goliath, oriยญginยญatยญing from the bibยญlicยญal Book of 1 Samuel 17, unfolds in ancient Israel durยญing a war between the Israelites and their long-standยญing adversarยญies, the Philistines. The Philistine army, seekยญing to domยญinยญate the Israelites, had set up camp in the valยญley of Elah, where they posiยญtioned themยญselves on one hill.
At the same time, King Saul and the Israelite forces occuยญpied anothยญer. Between them lay an open batยญtleยญfield. To break the staleยญmate, the Philistines put forยญward their ultiยญmate weapon: Goliath of Gath, a towerยญing warยญriยญor, described as over nine feet tall (based on some bibยญlicยญal transยญlaยญtions), clad in bronze armor, wieldยญing an enormยญous spear with an iron tip and a massive sword.
Goliath, brimยญming with arrogยญance and disยญdain for the Israelites, issued a chalยญlengeโโโrather than a full-scale battle, the conยญflict would be settled by single comยญbat: an Israelite chamยญpiยญon would face him in a duel, and the fate of both nations would rest on the outยญcome. For forty days, Goliath strode onto the batยญtleยญfield, mockยญing the Israelites and their God, darยญing any man to chalยญlenge him. But Saulโs warยญriยญors, paraยญlysed by fear, saw no hope against such an indomยญitยญable force.
Enter David, the youngยญest son of Jesse, a mere shepยญherd boy from Bethlehem who had been sent to the batยญtleยญfield to delivยญer food to his older brothยญers serving in Saulโs army. Unlike the solยญdiers, David did not see Goliathโs size as an insurยญmountยญable threat but as an affront to Israel and God. He volunยญteered to fight, much to the astonยญishยญment of Saul and his men.
Though iniยญtially disยญmissed due to his youth and inexยญperยญiยญence, David conยญvinced Saul by recountยญing how, as a shepยญherd, he had slain both lions and bears to proยญtect his flock. Rejecting the heavy armor offered to him, David took his simple sling and five smooth stones from a nearby stream. Facing Goliath, David remained undaunยญted by the giantโs taunts, declarยญing that he fought not with weapons but in the name of the Lord. With a single, perยญfectly aimed stone, David struck Goliath in the foreยญhead, causยญing the mighty warยญriยญor to crash face-first to the ground.
Swiftly, David seized Goliathโs sword and beheaded him, sealยญing vicยญtory for Israel. Upon witยญnessยญing their championโs defeat, the Philistines fled in terยญror, while Davidโs triยญumph marked the beginยญning of his rise to promยญinยญence, evenยญtuยญally leadยญing him to become King of Israel.
Underdogs, Misfits, and Giants
The tale of David and Goliath has become a uniยญverยญsal metaยญphor for the underยญdog overยญcomยญing impossible odds through courยญage, faith, and skill.
In David and Goliath: Underdogs, Misfits and the Art of Battling Giants, Malcolm Gladwell outยญlines the dynamยญic between mapยญping your and your opponยญentโs strengths and weakยญnesses. He goes on to sugยญgest that underยญdogs have sigยญniยญficยญant advantages:
Instead of fightยญing Goliath on his terms (strength and power), David used his advantยญages (speed and accurยญacy). One could argue that Davidโs disยญadยญvantยญages (being more negยญliยญgible and less experยญiยญenced) forced him to outยญsmart his opponent.
If David had been an experยญiยญenced warยญriยญor with the physยญicยญal size to match Goliathโs prowess, David would probยญably have decided to fight him on equal terms, right?
The Obstacle is the Way
The legend of David and Goliath endures as we find comยญfort in knowยญing that the strongest doesยญnโt always win. The underยญdog approach isnโt just helpยญful in fightยญing; it has a proven track record of being highly useยญful in pubยญlic relations.
In The Obstacle Is the Way: The Timeless Art of Turning Trials into Triumph, Ryan Holiday describes how choosยญing the path of the most resยญistยญance maxยญimยญises our growth as both indiยญviduยญals and organisations:
Having the odds stacked against you might not be as bad as it seems at first glance. If nothยญing else, itโs the start of a great story.
Play To Strength, Exploit Weakness
Yes, David exploits Goliathโs weakยญnesses (not being fast or accurยญate enough to beat David from a disยญtance). However, David still chooses to fight Goliath on โhisโ groundsโโโto steal away โhisโ audiยญence. Itโs safe to say that only a minorยญity thought that David would beat Goliath before the actuยญal fight.
From a PR perยญspectยญive, David could emerge from nowhere and beat the marยญket leadยญer by exploitยญing an interยญestยญing social pheยญnomenยญon: the majorยญity is someยญtimes just wrong.
Stupid, even.
The fact that a stagยญgerยญing majorยญity of bystandยญersโโโincludยญing one conยญfidยญent Goliathโโโnevยญer expecยญted David to stand a chance gave him the upper hand.
We celยญebยญrate that David chose a betยญter weapon when we should instead celยญebยญrate his sucยญcessยญful manipยญuยญlaยญtion of the stuยญpid majorยญity; from nowhere, David inserยญted himยญself into the top spot in just one bold move.
In the fight against Goliath, we admire David not only for his wits but also for his guts. After all, David did bring a slingยญshot to a sword fight.
The Classic Underdog Story
Leveraging an underยญdog pubยญlic relaยญtions strategy to beat a majorยญity leadยญer is not about bringยญing betยญter weapons; itโs about havยญing guts and takยญing on a majorยญity that is stuยญpid, incomยญpetยญent, dead wrongโโโand more powerยญful than you.
Some majorยญitยญies of today are destined to be gone tomorrow.
The more sigยญniยญficยญant and domยญinยญant the majorยญity, the more likely it is to conยญsist of a subยญstanยญtial silent majorยญity who are just along for the ride, mainly because everyยญone else seems to be.
Seeing a minorยญity defeat a majorยญity makes for good enterยญtainยญmentโโโwhen the majorยญity is also stuยญpid. From a PR perยญspectยญive, the big bad is about to beat the underยญdog against all the odds.
Now thatโs a great story, just begยญging to be told!
Learn more: The Underdog Story: David and Goliath
THANKS FOR READING.
Need PR help? Hire me here.
What should you study next?
Spin Academy | Online PR Courses
Spinโs PR School: Free Strategy PR Course
Unlock the power of straยญtegic pubยญlic relaยญtions with this free Strategy PR Course. Elevate your skills and boost your career today.
Public Relations Strategy 101
Public Relations Strategies
Grey-Hat PR Strategies
Learn more: All Free PR Courses
๐ก Subscribe and get a free ebook on how to get betยญter PR.
Annotations
1 | Silfwer, J. (2017, June 13). Conversion TheoryโโโDisproportionate Minority Influence. Doctor Spin | The PR Blog. https://โdocโtorโspinโ.net/โcโoโnโvโeโrโsโiโoโnโ-โtโhโeโoโry/ |
---|---|
2 | Conversion theยญory of minorยญity influยญence. (2021, February 12). In Wikipedia. https://โenโ.wikiโpeโdiaโ.org/โwโiโkโiโ/โCโoโnโvโeโrโsโiโoโnโ_โtโhโeโoโrโyโ_โoโfโ_โmโiโnโoโrโiโtโyโ_โiโnโfโlโuโeโnce |
3 | Conversion Theory. (2023). Changingmindsโ.org. https://โchanโgingโmindsโ.org/โeโxโpโlโaโnโaโtโiโoโnโsโ/โtโhโeโoโrโiโeโsโ/โcโoโnโvโeโrโsโiโoโnโ_โtโhโeโoโrโyโ.โhtm |
4 | Moscovici, S. (1980). Toward a theยญory of conยญverยญsion behaยญviour. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 209โโโ239. New York: Academic Press |
5 | Chryssochoou, X. and Volpato, C. (2004). Social Influence and the Power of Minorities: An Analysis of the Communist Manifesto, Social Justice Research, 17, 4, 357โโโ388 |
6 | Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.). Free Press. |
7 | Rogers, E. (1976). New Product Adoption and Diffusion. Journal of Consumer Research, 2, 290โโโ301. https://โdoiโ.org/โ1โ0โ.โ1โ0โ8โ6โ/โ2โ0โ8โ642 |