Enter the Hivemind

We might be on the precipitous of a new human language.

Cover photo by Jerry Silfwer (Instagram)

Will humans be susceptible to hivemind technology?

Some science fiction concepts persist. One such concept is the idea of connecting humans via digital interfaces.

From mental walkie-talkies to uploading and downloading human minds.

I can’t help but wonder: How far are we from creating brain-interfacing technologies? And would we be susceptible?

Let’s explore:

A Hivemind of Rat Brains

In 2013, the scientist Miguel Nicolelis used electrodes to connect brains. Well, rat brains. The rats in the experiment began to synchronise their electrical brain patterns as if sharing their brains.

In tests to distinguish between brain patterns, the networked rats outperformed individual non-networked rats.

The tasks were simple enough, but the remarkable thing was that these rats weren’t even close to each other. They communicated via the internet. In one of these experiments, the rats were separated by thousands of miles.

It’s the first organic computer,” scientists explained to The Guardian.

So, scientists have demonstrated an “internet of brains” — in rats.

What’s next?

“I Know Kung Fu”

There’s no shortage of science-fiction creativity regarding digital interfaces for the human brain, like how Neo learns kung fu in The Matrix.

The Matrix - Neo - I Know Kung Fu - Hivemind - Doctor Spin - The PR Blog
Neo now knows Kung Fu.

It’s reasonable to speculate about potential use cases for electronic brain enhancements. Learning an ancient martial arts system in the blink of an eye would be cool.

But brain connectivity doesn’t just have to be about adding features to brains. It could also be about adding new states of existence.

Co-existence, even.

Nexus - Ramez Naam - Hivemind
Time to upgrade?

The Synchronicity Drug in Nexus

In Nexus, science-fiction writer Ramez Naam suggests a drug allowing you to feel what others are feeling:

“Chuan bought a round of drinks. A bleach blonde Thai girl in a low-cut blouse and unnaturally large breasts came up and snuggled into his arm. He started telling a story about a drug called Synchronicity. Sam’s ears perked up.

‘Synchronicity?’ she innocently inquired. ‘What’s that?’

‘It’s N and M together. The champagne of trips.’ He kissed his fingers for emphasis.

‘N as in Nexus?’ She wanted him to spell it out for her.

‘Yeah. And M as in Empathek. The M makes you want to connect, want to understand, want to love. And the N actually lets you feel what other people are feeling. It’s beautiful. Magical.'”

Since these synchronisations are transferred electronically, the internet could be a carrier for such connections.

Will we see a new spiritual web? A new porn web? A unique, problem-solving web? A new artistic and creative web? A new type of social media?

Will we see new group sizes?

Typical Social Group Sizes

Have you ever heard of the social brain hypothesis? 1Zhou WX, Sornette D, Hill RA, Dunbar RI. Discrete hierarchical organization of social group sizes. Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Feb 22;272(1561):439-44. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2970. PMID: 15734699; PMCID: … Continue reading

“The ‘social brain hypothesis’ for the evolution of large brains in primates has led to evidence for the coevolution of neocortical size and social group sizes, suggesting that there is a cognitive constraint on group size that depends, in some way, on the volume of neural material available for processing and synthesizing information on social relationships.”
Source: Discrete Hierarchical Organization of Social Group Sizes

Scientific evidence suggests that people tend to organise themselves not in an even distribution of group sizes but in discrete hierarchical social groups of more particular sizes:

Alas, there seems to be a discrete statistical order in the complex chaos of human relationships:

  • Support clique (3–5 people)
  • Sympathy group (12–20 people)
  • Band (30–50 people)
  • Clan (150 people)
  • Megaband (500 people)
  • Tribe (1,000–2,000 people)

“Such discrete scale invariance could be related to that identified in signatures of herding behaviour in financial markets and might reflect a hierarchical processing of social nearness by human brains.”
Source: Discrete Hierarchical Organization of Social Group Sizes

Read also: Group Sizes (From Support Cliques to Tribes)

In 2017, Elon Musk and Paul Merolla publicly launched Neuralink. Since then, neuroscientists have come and gone. Not much is publicly known about how it’s going, but Musk was allegedly inspired by science-fiction writer Iain Bank’s neural lace.

Neuralink - Hivemind - Doctor Spin - The PR Blog
A Fitbit for your brain, perhaps?

Although, some progress has been showcased:

“In April 2021, Neuralink demonstrated a monkey playing the game ‘Pong’ using the Neuralink implant. While similar technology has existed since 2002, when a research group first demonstrated a monkey moving a computer cursor with neural signals, scientists acknowledged the engineering progress in making the implant wireless and increasing the number of implanted electrodes.”
Source: Wikipedia

Critics have argued that Neuralink has been unable to demonstrate any significant breakthroughs. And there hasn’t been exponential development since Nicolelis’ rat brain experiments in 2013.

Technological advancements aside, it’s reasonable to assume that there are two main fields of progress:

  • Electronic impulse stimuli (“Learning kung fu”) — Using electrodes, implants can use targeted electrical pulses to stimulate primitive functions. This could have near-future medical uses to assist people with the loss of specific functions. A blind person could get cues on how to navigate, for instance.
  • Brain state synchronisation (“The Synchronicity drug”) — By inducing various patterns of brain waves, two or more brains could potentially synchronise and put themselves in similar states. This could open up better collaboration and deeper states of sharing experiences.

Which of these potential directions of progress holds the most promise for near-future application?

Transhumanism and Human Cyborgs

In 2017, CyborgNest made the news by launching NorthSense, a small circuit board with piercings to connect it to the wearer’s body. The gadget lets its wearer sense the Earth’s magnetic field and always knows the North direction.

Others have had an RFID chip implanted to use instead of external chips.

Technological augmentations like these are interesting, but the advancements seem primitive. In 2022, CyborgNest is working on launching Sentero, a device that allows you to share experiences with other Sentero users. But they’re struggling, and going out of business seems to be a possible ending for the startup.

As a movement, transhumanism seems to be more of a philosophical and intellectual movement thus far.

On the practical side of human augmentation, we mostly see grand ideas and what appear to be false starts.

The Hard Problem in Neuroscience

Here’s an impossible question:
What’s a thought?

The comfortable answer is that thoughts are aggregates of clean electrical pulses travelling across synapses in a complex network of neurons.

The more uncomfortable answer is that we don’t know.

Thoughts seem to be the building blocks of consciousness — and we know nothing about consciousness. We don’t even know whether it exists or not.

The idea of transferring thoughts in the form of language will likely stay a science-fiction idea for a very long time. Brain processing and human memory storage might be very different beasts compared to how our computers are being built today.

Consciousness is the hard problem of neuroscience, it’s the hard problem of artificial intelligence, and it’s the hard problem of human technological interfaces, too.

The workaround for neuroscience is to continue to learn more. The workaround for AI is to assume that consciousness is an illusion and keep improving the capabilities of various systems.

And the workaround for neural connectivity seems to be trial and error:

Connect brains over the internet and investigate how neuroplastic our brains can adapt to each other.

Read also: The Human API: Enter the Cybernetic Resistance

Sharing (Brainwaves) is Caring

As a fan and long-time user of brain.fm, I’d be particularly interested in new types of brainwave-sharing applications.

It’s conceivable to expect specific effects from neuroplasticity — it might be possible for human brains to find new forms of “intuitive communication.”

If we can learn to detect and distinguish between a wide array of signals, two brains could potentially find a type of “morse code” to send detailed and specific messages to each other.

We could use computer-generated brainwave patterns to enhance learning speed or put people in an optimal mental state for a specific task.

The technology implies a severe leap in the importance of brainwave data. Is this a potential new frontier of data mining to finance the evolution of Metaverse headset technology?

Knowledge about which mental states make people susceptible to suggestion and social networking sites with brainwave-sharing communities could offer advertisers a new frontier of programmatic advertising.

Enter the Hivemind

If I were a betting man, I’d place my money on technology that allows humans to interface with each other. The medical uses for electronic impulse stimuli are great, but the business case seems weak.

What would hivemind technology entail?

We could use hivemind technology to enhance the enjoyment of artistic performances where you can synchronise some of your experience with both the artist and the audience.

It could open the door to an enhanced form of human language, a hivemind, where you can synchronise your brain patterns using technology.

Hivemind technologies will likely also be met by a techlash — severe challenges regarding legality and ethics.

On a more philosophical level, we might also be forced to ask ourselves:

  • What happens if our intuitions and brainwave patterns suddenly become targeted by silent miners looking to monetise them?
  • What happens if our emotional states become more accessible for governments and private interests?
  • What happens when we use brainwave data as training sets for AI applications?

1 Zhou WX, Sornette D, Hill RA, Dunbar RI. Discrete hierarchical organization of social group sizes. Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Feb 22;272(1561):439-44. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2970. PMID: 15734699; PMCID: PMC1634986.
Jerry Silfwer
Jerry Silfwerhttps://www.doctorspin.net/
Jerry Silfwer, alias Doctor Spin, is an awarded senior adviser specialising in public relations and digital strategy. Currently CEO at KIX Index and Spin Factory. Before that, he worked at Kaufmann, Whispr Group, Springtime PR, and Spotlight PR. Based in Stockholm, Sweden.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here


Grab a free subscription before you go.

Get notified of new blog posts & new PR courses

🔒 Please read my integrity- and cookie policy.

Write B2B Blog Posts

Use my storytelling template (with action prompts) to create blog posts for B2B experts using The Outline Method. Including my 16-page How-To Guide, Demo Post, and professional feedback.

Join the Solarpunk movement and create a sustainable future filled with community-based solutions, renewable energy, and beautiful designs inspired by nature.
Most popular