Doctor SpinTrendsTechnology TrendsPublic Relations in the Metaverse

Public Relations in the Metaverse

Take it slow and stand by for commoditisation.

Is the Metaverse the future of PR?

This blog article will explore potential opportunities and challenges for the PR industry in the Metaverse.

I’ve been working with implementation strategies for new technologies since 2007, and I can discern exciting similarities and differences when it comes to the Metaverse.

The Metaverse is a new buzzword circulating, but there are several indicators that we should take this development seriously.

Let’s get right into it:

Table of Contents

    Entering a Mixed Reality

    I spent part of this summer in Dalarna, a picturesque and rural part of Sweden. My brother-in-law brought his Oculus Quest 2, the VR gaming platform, and we played around with it.

    My son, who is six years old, took to the technology as if it was the most natural thing in the world—despite the headset being far too big for him.

    A merger of virtual worlds, the Metaverse, is beginning to enter our lives, it seems.

    “Go outside and play in the Metaverse, Jack.”

    Wikipedia describes the Metaverse as “a collective virtual shared space, created by the convergence of virtually enhanced physical reality and physically persistent virtual space, including the sum of all virtual worlds, augmented reality, and the Internet.”

    Still, however challenging the Metaverse is to describe, there’s no shortage of interest.

    “Imagine walking down the street. Suddenly, you think of a product you need. Immediately next to you, a vending machine appears, filled with the product and variations you were thinking of. You stop, pick an item from the vending machine, it’s shipped to your house, and then continue on your way.

    Next, imagine a husband and wife. The husband offers to go to the store, but the wife can’t remember the name and type of product she needs. Her brain-computer interface device recognises it for her and transmits a link to her husband’s device, along with what stores and aisles it’s located in.”

    Source: The Metaverse Is Coming And It’s A Very Big Deal (Forbes).

    Gamifying Business

    Games will soon be indistinguishable from reality if we can maintain even a fraction of our current development speed.

    With his now almost archetypical first principle-thinking, Elon Musk pointed out that, not long ago, computer games used to look like Pong. Today, games can immerse the gamer in vast and photorealistic open worlds.

    Musk goes even further to ask, “How do we know that this hasn’t already happened?” According to him—we don’t.

    “The strongest argument for us being in a simulation probably is the following: Forty years ago we had Pong. Like two rectangles and a dot. That was what games were.

    Now, forty years later, we have photorealistic 3D simulations with millions of people playing simultaneously, and it’s getting better every year. Soon we’ll have virtual reality, augmented reality.”

    Source: Elon Musk: ‘We’re likely living in a simulation and Pong is proof’ (Wired).

    A bit closer to our potential base reality, I’ve hypothesised what happens to PR when the online world ceases to be flat. Almost all of our existing corporate communication this far has been two-dimensional; it was two-dimensional before the Internet, and it has remained two-dimensional with the Internet.

    The idea is that we’ll see a growing number of applications for virtual realities (VR), augmented realities (AR), and 360-degree environments. These realities will, then, begin to merge into mixed reality.

    Does the Metaverse seem to be the logical continuation of that trend—perhaps even a brave new world to counter the Splinternet?

    The End of the Flat Web

    The Earth is round, and we shouldn’t be worrying about falling off the edge. The web, however, has been considered flat and best viewed through 2D surfaces. 1Of course, some people believe that the Earth is flat, too. Good luck with that, by the way.

    If the ceases to be flat, things are going to be different.

    As communicators and PR professionals, we’re still struggling with conquering a web that’s flat. We tend to think of the online space as a large print magazine. We still talk about pages, even.

    But there lots of ideas of from lots of people of how we all could put these new technologies to use:

    • Assisting professionals. Surgeons could have X-ray vision if the patient’s body has been scanned before the operation. Real estate agents could show listings to prospects without visiting them physically. Soldiers could be able to see around corners. Why not walk around in your living room and experience how various interior designers would choose to decorate it?
    • Immersive classroom experiences. Together with their students, teachers could interact across vast distances and work on practical projects together. Even the idea of collaborative meetings could be disrupted, changing how we interact socially and professionally across the web.
    • AI instructors. Imagine having a virtual PT with you in the gym, constantly analysing your form, monitoring your vitals, and giving you feedback. Brands could commercialise these types of companionships across great many service areas. Why don’t you let a local celebrity avatar guide you to your destination instead of using a map?
    • 360 storytelling. The Game of Thrones 360 intro trailer gives us a hint of how to experience entertainment soon. And Facebook has already deployed 360 videos on their platform. Will we even distinguish between movies and games in the future?
    • No more screens. Imagine not needing a screen on your desktop, only a keyboard, a mouse, and a pair of AR goggles. Then imagine not needing a television in your home. Screen size and location becomes arbitrary and more a question of mood and personal preference.
    • Immersive marketing. When buying clothes online, just put on your AR goggles, stand in front of a mirror, and then swirl to get an accurate 3D rendering of your body shape. Now you can see how various sizes will fit you before you buy.

    It’s safe to say that we can only begin to imagine the various types of use cases we’ll see emerge from mixed reality technologies.

    Facebook and Apple as Prime Movers

    With Facebook making serious moves into the Metaverse and persistent rumours about Apple releasing AR glasses, it’s not a stretch to imagine that the online world of tomorrow will have quite a lot more depth to it.

    Image credit: Techweartrend.

    Immersion is powerful, but it also contrasts utility and cost. “Form follows function”—and when is total immersion called for when it comes to, say, a B2B IT company operating locally?

    Still, however fun and exciting the Metaverse is already promising, especially for kids today, we must also remember that occupying mental bandwidth isn’t everything.

    Artificial restriction to conserve mental bandwidth can be at odds with asking users to immerse themselves even further.

    Are Facebook and Apple’s strategies to push users towards total immersion good for us? Will we be exposed to unforeseen mental health side effects?

    Not Meta’s First Dance

    We would be wise to remember that the Metaverse has had its fair share of false starts.

    Many downloaded and played around with the app Layar, through which you could see a layer of digital content on top of the physical world. Augmentation was also something Google took a stab at with their Google Glass project, but only by using a small viewfinder in the upper corner of the user’s visual field.

    Meta Vision was founded by Meron Gribetz in 2014. The company had great ambitions and a working prototype. Funding ran out and the company had to close shop in 2019. It’s not known which company bought their assets.

    Meta Vision - Metaverse - Meron Gribetz
    Meta Vision (2014-2019).

    “The story of Meta’s demise is as much about the augmented and virtual-reality industry as it is about hardware startups, their founders, and their often futile attempts to compete with billion-dollar companies.”

    Source: The Story Behind Meta, the AR Startup That Just Had Its Assets Sold to a Mystery Buyer (Variety).

    Now, with companies like Facebook, Apple, and Microsoft invested in the race, the Metaverse is a much more tangible project than it was for a small Silicon Valley startup in 2014.

    But AR hardware is tough to get right.

    Focus on Comms, Not Tech

    Against this backdrop, I worry that brands will become too application-centric for the Metaverse.

    Imagine a real-estate brand running apartments and offices. The brand might deploy applications for everything from virtual tours for prospects to augmented environments for its communal areas. Such early developments will likely be costly, and the results are likely to be relatively poor from a user perspective.

    But we know from past technological advancements that new applications tend to be commoditised rather quickly. In some instances, the applications are freemium, even. WordPress is today powering about 37% of all websites (62% of all CMS systems) globally, to give just one example.

    As a PR professional today, I advise against developing avant-garde applications for novel technologies. Sure, there won’t be a shortage of cool PR ideas for such applications, but we should be mindful of playing to our strengths as a profession—and developing VR- and AR applications isn’t one of them.

    However technologically determined our societies may be, tech-focused companies and startups will surely volunteer to do most of the heavy lifting of developing these new technologies, driving adoption rates, and pivoting into sustainable use cases. Tech companies will do all of this—while fiercely racing each other against rapid price drops.

    Agencies have already begun pitching ideas for developing incredible new VR- and AR applications. Somehow, it feels as if we’ve been down this road several times before.

    I know that I sure have.

    Early Adoption vs High Entry Costs

    When should we, as PR professionals, transition into the Metaverse?

    In the early 2010s, I helped several brands develop new user community applications. These applications were excellent and included gamification features, but developing these platforms also required substantial financial investments.

    A few years later, we could buy white-labelled user communities for a dime and a dollar per month.

    Today, basic implementation is often a 5-minute process of signing up, uploading a logo, and picking out your brand colours. And there are no shortages of available software sold on the cheap as services.

    When Apple releases an AppStore for their forthcoming AR glasses, there will be substantial PR opportunities, for instance.

    Will investments in developing early applications outweigh the benefits of doubling down on the contents of your communication? It’s an important consideration that deserves priority.

    But as a guiding principle: organisations should adopt new technologies when it makes corporate communication better—and when implementation makes business sense.

    If nothing else, communication is useless when leaving the market behind.

    Cover photo by Jerry Silfwer (Prints/Instagram)

    Veckans Brief Logo

    “Allt du behöver veta om metaverse”

    Publicity (in Swedish): An interview with PR experts Jerry Silfwer and Karin Bäcklund about Meteverse in Veckans Brief.

    Read Article
    1 Of course, some people believe that the Earth is flat, too. Good luck with that, by the way.


    Jerry Silfwer
    Jerry Silfwer
    Jerry Silfwer, aka Doctor Spin, is an awarded senior adviser specialising in public relations and digital strategy. Currently CEO at KIX Index and Spin Factory. Before that, he worked at Kaufmann, Whispr Group, Springtime PR, and Spotlight PR. Based in Stockholm, Sweden.
    Buy PR Merch

    Grab a free subscription before you go.

    Get notified of new blog posts & new PR courses

    🔒 Please read my integrity- and cookie policy.

    The Borg Complex refers to a specific form of technological determinism, but in my case, it's also a psychological fallacy.
    Most popular