Attention Spans in the Social Media Age

Are our atten­tion spans shrink­ing due to social media?

We often hear that social media is rot­ting our brains, that our atten­tion spans are shrink­ing faster than a TikTok video ends, and that we are now incap­able of focus­ing on any­thing that isn’t accom­pan­ied by a bar­rage of likes and comments. 

But is there any truth to these claims, or are we mis­un­der­stand­ing what “atten­tion” really means? 

Is our men­tal band­width chan­ging, or are we adapt­ing to a new environment?

Here we go:

Do We Have “Online Brains”?

Spin Academy | Online PR Courses

The Online Brain Hypothesis

In the rap­idly evolving digit­al age, how we pro­cess inform­a­tion is being trans­formed. The rise of the inter­net and its ever-chan­ging stream of inform­a­tion have led to a notice­able shift in our atten­tion­al capacities. 

“The Internet can alter our cog­ni­tion, affect­ing atten­tion, memory, and social cog­ni­tion, with poten­tial brain changes.”
Source: World Psychiatry ¹Firth, J., Torous, J., Stubbs, B., Firth, J., Steiner, G., Smith, L., Alvarez-Jimenez, M., Gleeson, J., Vancampfort, D., Armitage, C., & Sarris, J. (2019). The “online brain”: how the … Continue read­ing

A study pub­lished in the National Center for Biotechnology Information high­lights this trend, emphas­iz­ing how the mul­ti­tude of online media sources vies for our atten­tion, often at the expense of our abil­ity to con­cen­trate for exten­ded peri­ods. ²Firth, J., Torous, J., Stubbs, B., Firth, J. A., Steiner, G. Z., Smith, L., Gleeson, J., Vancampfort, D., Armitage, C. J., & Sarris, J. (2019). The “online brain”: How the Internet may be … Continue read­ing

This phe­nomen­on, some­times called the ‘online brain’, raises crit­ic­al ques­tions about the long-term effects of digit­al media on cog­nit­ive func­tions, includ­ing memory and focus. 

“The human brain’s atten­tion sys­tem has evolved over time, with genet­ic vari­ations and exper­i­ence play­ing a role in indi­vidu­al dif­fer­ences in atten­tion­al effi­ciency.”
Source: Annual review of neur­os­cience ³Petersen, S., & Posner, M. (2012). The atten­tion sys­tem of the human brain. Annual review of neur­os­cience, 35, 73 – 89. https://​doi​.org/​1​0​.​1​1​4​6​/​a​n​n​u​r​e​v​-​n​e​u​r​o​-​0​6​2​111 – 150525

The broad­er implic­a­tions of our inter­ac­tion with digit­al media are fur­ther under­scored by a study in Nature Communications, which reveals a nar­row­ing of our col­lect­ive atten­tion span. ⁴Abundance of inform­a­tion nar­rows our col­lect­ive atten­tion span. (2019, April 15). ScienceDaily. https://​www​.sci​en​cedaily​.com/​r​e​l​e​a​s​e​s​/​2​0​1​9​/​0​4​/​1​9​0​4​1​5​0​8​1​9​5​9​.​htm

This phe­nomen­on is not just con­fined to social media; it’s a trend observed across vari­ous domains, sug­gest­ing a wide­spread cul­tur­al shift in how we con­sume and pro­cess information. 

The gradu­al decline in atten­tion spans, par­tic­u­larly over the last few dec­ades, sig­nals a press­ing chal­lenge for today’s organ­iz­a­tions. Research by Gloria Mark, PhD, from the University of California Irvine, sheds light on how our engage­ments with the inter­net and digit­al devices reshape our focus. ⁵Mark, G. (2023). Why our atten­tion spans are shrink­ing. American Psychological Association. https://​www​.apa​.org/​n​e​w​s​/​p​o​d​c​a​s​t​s​/​s​p​e​a​k​i​n​g​-​o​f​-​p​s​y​c​h​o​l​o​g​y​/​a​t​t​e​n​t​i​o​n​-​s​p​ans

The study’s find­ings are a wake-up call to busi­nesses and con­tent cre­at­ors, indic­at­ing that cap­tur­ing and main­tain­ing an audi­ence’s atten­tion is becom­ing more challenging. 

Despite the grow­ing con­cern over the impact of social media and the fast-paced news cycle on our atten­tion spans, a gap in empir­ic­al data per­sists. This lack of con­crete evid­ence points to the neces­sity for more rig­or­ous research to under­stand the true extent of mass medi­a’s influ­ence on cog­nit­ive func­tions. ⁶Abundance of inform­a­tion nar­rows our col­lect­ive atten­tion span. (2019, April 15). EurekAlert! https://​www​.eurekalert​.org/​n​e​w​s​-​r​e​l​e​a​s​e​s​/​4​9​0​177

Learn more: The Online Brain Hypothesis

💡 Subscribe and get a free ebook on how to get bet­ter PR ideas.

Attention Spans: A Complex Picture

The notion that our atten­tion spans are shrink­ing has become an almost unques­tioned cul­tur­al trope. Yet, the data behind these asser­tions paints a more com­plex picture. 

For instance, stud­ies have sug­ges­ted that what appears to be a reduced atten­tion span may reflect an adapt­a­tion to increased digit­al stim­u­la­tion rather than an inher­ent decline in our cog­nit­ive abilities. 

A study by van der Schuur et al. (2015) points out that while teen­agers appear to have short­er bursts of atten­tion, this may be due to their abil­ity to switch rap­idly between tasks rather than a com­plete inab­il­ity to focus. It’s not so much that they can’t con­cen­trate but that they are nav­ig­at­ing an envir­on­ment that demands more fre­quent shifts. ⁷van der Schuur, W. A., Baumgartner, S. E., & Sumter, S. R. (2015). The rela­tion­ship between media mul­ti­task­ing and atten­tion prob­lems in adoles­cents: Results of a lon­git­ud­in­al study. Journal of … Continue read­ing

Similarly, Ophir, Nass, and Wagner (2009) revealed that indi­vidu­als who fre­quently use mul­tiple forms of media sim­ul­tan­eously — so-called “media mul­ti­task­ers” — tend to per­form worse on tasks requir­ing sus­tained focus. ⁸Ophir, E., Nass, C., & Wagner, A. D. (2009). Cognitive con­trol in media mul­ti­task­ers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(37), 15583 – 15587

The Ophir, Nass, and Wagner study illus­trates that heavy media mul­ti­task­ing cor­rel­ates with dimin­ished atten­tion­al con­trol. However, it doesn’t imply an over­all atrophy of atten­tion­al abil­it­ies; instead, it sug­gests that our brains con­stantly pri­or­it­ise dif­fer­ent types of engagement.

Attention Spans Remain Stable

Still, con­cerns over a deep, reflect­ive atten­tion decline are not unfoun­ded. Carr (2010) argues in “The Shallows: What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brains” that the digit­al land­scape, emphas­ising rap­id, bite-sized con­tent, is rewir­ing our minds to prefer imme­di­acy and nov­elty over con­tem­plat­ive depth. ⁹Carr, N. (2010). The Shallows: What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brains. W. W. Norton & Company.

This trans­form­a­tion means that the brain becomes less inclined to engage in activ­it­ies that demand pro­longed con­cen­tra­tion — read­ing a lengthy book, for instance, or deeply con­sid­er­ing a com­plex prob­lem without the inter­fer­ence of con­stant notifications. 

Our brain’s neuro­plas­ti­city allows it to recon­fig­ure, and we get bet­ter at what we repeatedly prac­tice — brief bursts of brows­ing rather than deep dives.

But anoth­er per­spect­ive sug­gests that our men­tal band­width isn’t shrink­ing — it’s chan­ging form. Research by Alloway and Alloway (2012) found that work­ing memory capa­city, a key pre­dict­or of atten­tion span, remains stable des­pite increased expos­ure to digit­al media. ¹⁰Alloway, T. P., & Alloway, R. G. (2012). The impact of engage­ment with social media on cog­nit­ive func­tion­ing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(6), 349 – 357

The research­ers noted that while young people might struggle with unin­ter­rup­ted, long-form tasks, their work­ing memory skills were as strong as those of pre­vi­ous gen­er­a­tions. This sug­gests a shift in how atten­tion is deployed rather than an out­right diminishment.

Social Media Redirects Our Attention

We now nav­ig­ate a land­scape sat­ur­ated with inform­a­tion, requir­ing con­stant fil­ter­ing and rap­id decision-mak­ing about what deserves our focus. 

Social media exploits this cog­nit­ive archi­tec­ture by deliv­er­ing inform­a­tion and enter­tain­ment in imme­di­ate, grat­i­fy­ing doses — it does not neces­sar­ily dimin­ish our men­tal band­width but redir­ects it.

While it may be tempt­ing to claim that social media is deteri­or­at­ing our atten­tion spans, the real­ity is more nuanced:

We are exper­i­en­cing an evol­u­tion of atten­tion­al strategies, not a col­lapse of cog­nit­ive ability. 

Our brains, fun­da­ment­ally equipped to adapt, are just as cap­able of sus­tained focus as they were mil­len­nia ago; the nature of what we choose to focus on has shifted. 

Perhaps the real ques­tion isn’t wheth­er our atten­tion spans are shrink­ing but wheth­er we can still con­trol where we dir­ect them amidst the caco­phony of mod­ern life.

PR Resource: The Anatomy of Attention

“There’s only one thing in the world worse than being talked about, and that is not being talked about.”
— Oscar Wilde

Spin Academy | Online PR Courses

The Anatomy of Attention

Attention is an essen­tial com­pon­ent of pub­lic relations:

• An organ­isa­tion, starved of atten­tion, trust, and loy­alty, is com­pelled to wage a per­petu­al struggle for its con­tin­ued existence.

And it’s not just organ­isa­tions. We all seem to crave atten­tion in some form or another:

“People want to be loved; fail­ing that admired; fail­ing that feared; fail­ing that hated and des­pised. They want to evoke some sort of sen­ti­ment. The soul shud­ders before obli­vi­on and seeks con­nec­tion at any price.”
— Hjalmar Söderberg (1869−1941), Swedish author

It’s fear of social isol­a­tion— and atten­tion star­va­tion.

But what con­sti­tutes ‘atten­tion’?

“Attention is a com­plex, real neur­al archi­tec­ture (‘RNA’) mod­el that integ­rates vari­ous cog­nit­ive mod­els and brain cen­ters to per­form tasks like visu­al search.”
Source: Trends in cog­nit­ive sci­ences ¹¹Shipp, S. (2004). The brain cir­cuitry of atten­tion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 223 – 230. https://​doi​.org/​1​0​.​1​0​1​6​/​j​.​t​i​c​s​.​2​0​0​4​.​0​3​.​004

Each of the below terms refers to a spe­cif­ic aspect or type of atten­tion (“men­tal band­width”), a com­plex cog­nit­ive pro­cess. ¹²Schweizer, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Goldhammer, F. (2005). The struc­ture of the rela­tion­ship between atten­tion and intel­li­gence. Intelligence, 33(6), 589 – 611. … Continue read­ing

Let’s explore dif­fer­ent types of attention:

• Alertness. This is the state of being watch­ful and ready to respond. It’s the most basic form of atten­tion, rep­res­ent­ing our read­i­ness to per­ceive and pro­cess inform­a­tion from the environment.
• Sustained atten­tion. This involves focus­ing on a spe­cif­ic task or stim­u­lus over a pro­longed peri­od. It’s cru­cial for tasks that require ongo­ing con­cen­tra­tion, like read­ing or driving.
• Focused atten­tion. This refers to the abil­ity to con­cen­trate on one par­tic­u­lar stim­u­lus or task while ignor­ing oth­ers. It’s the abil­ity to focus nar­rowly on a single thing.
• Attentional switch­ing. Also known as task switch­ing or cog­nit­ive flex­ib­il­ity, this involves shift­ing focus from one task to anoth­er. It’s crit­ic­al for mul­ti­task­ing and adapt­ing to chan­ging demands or priorities.
• Divided atten­tion. This is the abil­ity to pro­cess two or more responses or react to mul­tiple tasks sim­ul­tan­eously. It’s often tested by ask­ing people to per­form two tasks sim­ul­tan­eously, like listen­ing to a con­ver­sa­tion while writing.
• Attention accord­ing to the super­vis­ory atten­tion­al sys­tem. This concept, derived from cog­nit­ive psy­cho­logy, refers to a high­er-level con­trol sys­tem that reg­u­lates the alloc­a­tion of atten­tion, par­tic­u­larly in situ­ations requir­ing plan­ning or decision-making.
• Attention as inhib­i­tion. This aspect of atten­tion involves sup­press­ing irrel­ev­ant or dis­tract­ing stim­uli. It’s a cru­cial com­pon­ent of focused atten­tion and self-regulation.
• Spatial atten­tion. This type of atten­tion focuses on a spe­cif­ic area with­in the visu­al field. It’s like a spot­light that enhances inform­a­tion pro­cessing in a par­tic­u­lar location.
• Attention as plan­ning. This per­spect­ive views atten­tion as a resource that needs to be alloc­ated effi­ciently, espe­cially in com­plex tasks requir­ing stra­tegic plan­ning and organization.
• Interference. In the con­text of atten­tion, inter­fer­ence refers to the pro­cess by which irrel­ev­ant inform­a­tion or dis­trac­tions impede the effi­ciency of cog­nit­ive processing.
• Attention as arous­al. This con­siders atten­tion in the con­text of the gen­er­al level of alert­ness or arous­al. It’s about the read­i­ness of the brain to engage with stim­uli or tasks.
• Attention accord­ing to the assess­ment tra­di­tion. This refers to meas­ur­ing and eval­u­at­ing atten­tion­al pro­cesses, often in clin­ic­al or edu­ca­tion­al set­tings, to identi­fy atten­tion defi­cits or disorders.

Each type of atten­tion plays a cru­cial role in how we inter­act with and pro­cess inform­a­tion from our envir­on­ment, and under­stand­ing these dif­fer­ent aspects is key in fields like psy­cho­logy, neur­os­cience, and education.

Learn more: The Anatomy of Attention

💡 Subscribe and get a free ebook on how to get bet­ter PR ideas.