Doctor SpinTrendsCultural TrendsHow To Navigate the Moral War

How To Navigate the Moral War

Brands shouldn't preach moral behaviour to adults.

There’s a moral war raging for our minds.

Cancel culture. De-platforming. Identity politics. Political correctness. Woke capitalism. Alternative facts. Fake news. Filter bubbles. Armies of online trolls. Bot attacks. Electoral tampering. Populism.

It’s the alt-right versus the alt-left.

Where does this leave the rest of us?
Where does this leave regular businesses?

Let’s dive right into it:

Table of Contents

    The Just War

    The moral war is a jus bellum justum (a just war) for our moral values.

    The just war theory dictates that “[… ] war, while terrible (but less so with the right conduct), is not always the worst option. Important responsibilities, undesirable outcomes, or preventable atrocities may justify war”.

    And this moral war is spelling devastating consequences for businesses all over the world.

    Brandcallers use deliberate misunderstandings as tools only to bring brands to political compliance. Business after business is being hung out to dry and used as a case-in-point by both extremes in this moral war.

    Businesses are trying to rise to the challenge, but how?

    To start, we need to understand this new media landscape.

    Armies of Jurors and Judges

    So, how should your business navigate this inflammatory moral war?

    There are three critical online publics segmented based on how they communicate their underlying moral philosophy. And they use the internet as their primary tool for organising themselves and exerting moral extortion.

    Social justice warriors (the alt-left) will not accept any perceived “injustice”. They regard themselves as morally superior, and they see all opponents as immediate threats to their way of life. According to this public, online aggression is an appropriate political expression.

    Patriotic traditionalists (the alt-right) see “common sense” derived from generations of empirical moral insights to trump all other forms of discernment. They celebrate homogeneity and patriotism and are often religious. According to this public, online aggression is a proper political expression.

    The silent majority are moderately invested in moral philosophy; they are more focused on making ends meet in their personal lives. They avoid taking any such aggressive stands—at least publicly. However, they actively “vote” online by clicking, watching, reading, and listening.

    How should a brand navigate this moral war?
    Either pick a side and stick with it—or steer clear?

    Scoring Moral Points

    For any brand struggling with environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues, it’s tempting to try and score quick points with short-lived public “outrages.”

    Sure enough, businesses that decide to pose as beacons for moral modelling could very well gain traction with the chosen minority.

    But does this make business sense?

    From a public relations perspective, conflicts such as these could serve as fuel for media attention, but it’s far from evident that these brands will increase their market shares; the share-of-voice for the loudest agitators is rarely proportional to their actual numbers.

    A recent example would be Gillette’s campaign in which they attacked their customer base with accusations of not being accountable enough for toxic masculinity.

    Investment advisor Jack Hough writes:

    “That raises the question of whether Gillette’s financial results are suffering because of its toxic-masculinity misfire. On Tuesday, Procter & Gamble (PG) beat earnings and revenue forecasts, but the stock fell 3% on a day the S&P 500 closed at a new high.”

    In short:

    Most brands will likely do better if they realise that it’s not their core business to teach grown-ups about what constitutes moral behaviour.

    Few ordinary businesses are suited to serve as mouthpieces for hundreds—or even thousands—of coworkers. Or customers—sometimes in their millions.

    Like me, you probably have your own set of moral convictions, but these convictions aren’t necessarily the right baseline for all corporate communications activities.

    Moral Conformity and HR

    It’s true that brands must stand for something and that they must be brave enough to see these fights through. A brand must find its Core Message, which must resonate with owners, leaders, coworkers, and customers.

    But the moral war isn’t just a PR challenge.

    The foundation for long-term strategic success in navigating a moral war befalls HR, human resources.

    HR is being encouraged to hire and fire with diversity in mind. But when it comes to moral convictions, diversity of thought suddenly becomes the no. 1 enemy of the HR department.

    Today, HR must decide if they should hire and fire based on moral classification—or competence levels. It’s a tough choice for many.

    The ability to find coworkers with highly compatible morals, yet are still highly diverse in every other way, is an impossible HR strategy.

    How to Navigate the Moral War

    Avoid trying to score quick moral points. CSR- and ESG activities should be laser-focused, clearly defined, and business relevant.

    Hire and fire based on competency. Diversity should serve as a fallback when all else is equal—and this goes for moral diversity, too.

    Internally, celebrate different thinking. Having coworkers who think differently is an asset to any business culture.

    Don’t let the extreme publics intimidate you. The extremes are loud and noisy, especially online, but they don’t have the numbers to match.

    Focus your PR strategy on the silent majority. Most of your customer base will be in the silent majority, not in the extremes.

    Cover photo by Jerry Silfwer (Prints/Instagram)

    .

    Jerry Silfwer
    Jerry Silfwerhttps://www.doctorspin.net/
    Jerry Silfwer, aka Doctor Spin, is an awarded senior adviser specialising in public relations and digital strategy. Currently CEO at KIX Index and Spin Factory. Before that, he worked at Kaufmann, Whispr Group, Springtime PR, and Spotlight PR. Based in Stockholm, Sweden.
    Buy PR Merch

    Grab a free subscription before you go.

    Get notified of new blog posts & new PR courses

    🔒 Please read my integrity- and cookie policy.

    The Borg Complex refers to a specific form of technological determinism, but in my case, it's also a psychological fallacy.
    Most popular