Doctor SpinDigital FirstContent & InboundBeware of Conversion Cannibalism

Beware of Conversion Cannibalism

How we allow CTAs to cannibalise on each other.

Does your front page suffer from conversion cannibalism?

Most organisations put too much content on their front pages. Unknowingly, they hurt their conversions and, by extension—their business objectives.

In this article, I will demonstrate why less is more also in front page design.

Let’s dive right in:

Table of Contents

    The Corporate Front Page Debate

    “We must put my stuff on the front page because it’s crucial.”

    I often get involved in heated debates on what to include on the front page. If I weigh into the debate that they should remove certain elements, the chances are that someone will get offended. Like, “how dare you remove my work from our front page?”

    Since this is a tricky situation, I want to give you some easy-to-follow examples to help you get your front page strategy straight.

    The key for an efficient front page design is to stop thinking about what to put on the front page regarding what’s “important” and what’s “not important”. Take a look at Google’s front page:

    The Google Front Page
    Google’s front page is clean. How about yours?

    Now, Google has lots of essential products. Google Drive, Google Maps, Google Chrome, Google Earth, Google Trends, Google Adsense, Google Scholar, and many more. The only service that makes it onto the front page is Gmail (top right corner), but it isn’t exactly prominent on the front page.

    All these Google products are reasonably significant, right? Even still, these Google products don’t make the cut for Google’s front page—the Google search page.

    And Google ought to know something about how the web works.

    The Paradox of Choice

    Imagine a web page with 1,000 visitors per day. The page has only one button for the users to click. The conversion rate for the site is 2% on average. That’s 20 clicks on your button.

    So, what if you add another button? In most use cases, the conversion rate for the page doesn’t go up—it falls. Instead of getting 20 clicks on one button, you might find yourself getting ten clicks in total on two buttons.

    Call-to-actions tend to cannibalise on each other.

    This is the paradox of choice. In 1995, Professor Shena Iyengar from Columbia University put up a market stall with different jam flavours. When she offered twenty-four options, more people came to the booth. When she only offered six choices, more people converted into paying customers.

    Our decision-making process is complex, but researchers have offered many possible explanations such as decision fatigue, analysis paralysis, and buyer’s remorse.

    Strive to show visitors only what they came for. Kill your darlings.

    Only when the user goes deeper into your site can you show them more of your content.

    Horizontal vs. Vertical CTAs

    An easy way to think of website CTAs (call-to-actions) is to think of buttons and forms. Buttons and forms are precious since they determine your conversions.

    There is a form of “alignment cannibalism” taking place when it comes to buttons and forms. And these alignment issues should be considered when designing your front page.

    • Buttons and forms with different CTAs compete on a web page. One single CTA often converts more than several CTAs in total.
    • Buttons and forms compete with each other when they’re stacked horizontally on a web page. It would be best to strive only to present one single button or form per horizontal block.
    • Buttons and forms with different CTAs compete with each other if they’re stacked vertically, too. But not as much as if you stacked them horizontally.
    • If buttons and forms are stacked vertically and contain the same CTA, the total conversion rate for that web page is likely to go up!

    On the web today, we see a trend where there is white space to both the left and right of buttons and forms. And we see a trend where more of the same CTAs are stacked from top to bottom.

    You’re Probably Not an Exception

    Yes, there are successful businesses that also have cluttered websites:

    Amazon.com might be the prime example, but my favourite got to be lingscars.com and her rather “more-is-more” approach to web design:

    Lings Car Website Design
    A prime example of cluttered website design that works—for Ling.

    But your business is probably not Ling’s. And it probably isn’t Amazon’s.

    You also have to ask yourself if cluttered is the right direction for your brand? A statistical guess would be: No.

    Unless you’re running a non-posh e-commerce- or news site with lots of content and a high turnover on content items, I would be careful with such an over-the-top strategy.

    Priority: The Small Ask

    The choice of what to put on the front page isn’t related to what’s necessary or not necessary. Instead, your front page should be regarded only as a point of entry into your brand’s universe.

    The psychology behind focusing on smaller asks is straightforward, as explained by the Engagement Pyramid:

    Engagement Pyramid
    The Engagement Pyramid (based on the 1-9-90 rule).

    By making a small ask (your email address in exchange for something valuable to you) instead of a big ask (invest in hiring me as an advisor), I can capture and nurture trusting relationships over time, slowly moving prospects from 9% to 1%.

    (Small asks are often referred to as lead magnets.)

    The Iceberg Publishing Strategy

    If we look back at the Google example, one could say that they are using multiple front pages. If we look at Google Drive’s “front page”, you can see the same strategy; there are just one message and one CTA (call-to-action) above the fold. It works because it’s crystal clear:

    Instead of trying to cram everything into one single front page, your business could utilise multiple high-converting “front pages” instead, a strategy I call Iceberg Publishing—where there are many hidden direct entry pages beneath the site’s surface.

    A landing page isn’t a page where people “land”. A landing page is a single-purpose web page with one CTA only.

    More and more conversion experts argue that most pages within a website’s structure should be landing pages. Landing pages are accessible for search engines to drive relevant traffic to, and since they’re stripped of any unnecessary content. This is a strategy I call Iceberg Publishing, where many pages are doing most of the site’s heavy lifting beneath the surface.

    Please keep it clean, people.

    Cover photo by Jerry Silfwer (Prints/Instagram)

    .

    Jerry Silfwer
    Jerry Silfwerhttps://www.doctorspin.net/
    Jerry Silfwer, aka Doctor Spin, is an awarded senior adviser specialising in public relations and digital strategy. Currently CEO at KIX Index and Spin Factory. Before that, he worked at Kaufmann, Whispr Group, Springtime PR, and Spotlight PR. Based in Stockholm, Sweden.
    Buy PR Merch

    Grab a free subscription before you go.

    Get notified of new blog posts & new PR courses

    🔒 Please read my integrity- and cookie policy.

    Are you doing enough — for content? The battle cry "For content!" used by many social media influencers tells us something.
    Most popular