The Public Relations BlogPR TrendsBusiness ShiftsThe Splinternet—Mankind’s Battle for Internet Control

The Splinternet — Mankind’s Battle for Internet Control

The most epic power struggle of our era.

Cover photo: @jerrysilfwer

Advertisment

Is the splin­ter­net com­ing — or is it already upon us?

The splin­ter­net is the idea that the inter­net “splin­ters” into sev­er­al dif­fer­ent inter­nets that aren’t con­nec­ted in any mean­ing­ful way.

The splin­ter­net (also referred to as cyber-balkan­isa­tion or inter­net balkan­isa­tion) is a char­ac­ter­isa­tion of the Internet as splin­ter­ing and divid­ing due to vari­ous factors, such as tech­no­logy, com­merce, polit­ics, nation­al­ism, reli­gion, and diver­gent nation­al interests.”
Source: Wikipedia 1Splinternet. (2022, December 12). In Wikipedia. https://​en​.wiki​pe​dia​.org/​w​i​k​i​/​S​p​l​i​n​t​e​r​net

The idea of the splin­ter­net is by no means a new concept.

Early tech blog­gers like Doc Searls and Stephen Lewis began the­or­ising about a splin­ter­net as early as 2008, not­ing that the free and open ideals that built the world wide web are increas­ingly at odds with the polit­ic­al agen­das of gov­ern­ments across the globe.”
Source: Business Insider 2Holmes, A. (2020, August 6). The “splin­ter­net”: How US-China ten­sion could end the world wide web. Business Insider. … Continue read­ing

‌Some sug­gest that this splin­ter­ing is now becom­ing worse and worse. 

In Western media, China is often named as one of the main cul­prits on the glob­al stage when it comes to the splin­ter­net — and also the biggest win­ner of such a Balkanisation.

A frac­tured inter­net means coun­tries that can col­lect large amounts of data with­in their own bor­ders will have an advant­age in devel­op­ing arti­fi­cial intel­li­gence and oth­er tech­no­lo­gies. Nowhere more so than China, with 900 mil­lion people on the inter­net. There are already signs that pop­u­la­tion is becom­ing a key driver in innov­a­tion and eco­nom­ic growth. China’s share in the top 10% of most-cited papers on AI came to 26.5% in 2018, accord­ing to the Allen Institute for Artificial Intelligence, fast approach­ing the American share of 29%. Allen Institute seni­or pro­gram man­ager Carissa Schoenick pre­dicted in 2019 that China was poised to unseat the US as the world’s lead­er in the com­ing years. […] China now accounts for 23% of cross-bor­der data flows, nearly twice the share of the US, which ranks a dis­tant second with 12%.”
Source: Nikkei Asia 3Tsunashima, T. (2020, November 25). China rises as world’s data super­power as inter­net frac­tures. Nikkei Asia. … Continue read­ing

‌This is a prob­lem­at­ic situ­ation with far-reach­ing implications. 

While the US inter­net, rel­at­ive to China, seems to be in free fall, the Trump admin­is­tra­tion attemp­ted to strike back against China by tar­get­ing the Chinese social media app TikTok.

On one hand, with 100 mil­lion Americans using the app reg­u­larly, TikTok rep­res­ents a vibrant hub of all kinds of speech — some that’s polit­ic­al, and much that isn’t — and to kill it off would rep­res­ent a dire sup­pres­sion of speech. That Trump’s decision appears to have been influ­enced by a recent stunt in which TikTok users registered en masse for one of his ral­lies and then no-showed only under­scores the dangers of hav­ing nation­al tech policy set by a thin-skinned strong­man.”
Source: The Verge 4Newton, C. (2020, August 18). How the forced sale of TikTok could splinter the inter­net. The Verge. … Continue read­ing

‌It’s import­ant to note that the inter­net might not be as stable as some think:

Over 99 per cent of all glob­al inter­net com­mu­nic­a­tions are facil­it­ated by an impress­ive web of under­sea cables, con­nect­ing all corners of the world. A sub­mar­ine delib­er­ately des­troy­ing one of these under­sea cables at a hard to reach place could bring down parts of the inter­net for weeks, and so all the sys­tems that rely upon it.”
Source: Nesta 5Bego, K. (2016). The Splinternet. Nesta. https://​www​.nesta​.org​.uk/​f​e​a​t​u​r​e​/​1​0​-​p​r​e​d​i​c​t​i​o​n​s​-​2​0​1​7​/​t​h​e​-​s​p​l​i​n​t​e​r​n​et/

And it would be a mis­take to think that China and the U.S. are the only key play­ers in this glob­al power struggle.

Russia is reportedly exper­i­ment­ing with isol­at­ing its inter­net from the rest of the world.

Many Russians fear that the Russian author­it­ies will use the pan­dem­ic to increase cyber-sur­veil­lance of the pop­u­la­tion. QR-codes already restrict free­dom of move­ment. Russia has been work­ing on the pos­sib­il­ity to close the coun­try off by cre­at­ing a ‘sov­er­eign Ru-net’, look­ing at the Chinese example.”
Source: Raam op Rusland 6Epifanova, A. (2020, May 18). Is tight­en­ing con­trol via “Sovereign Splinternet” in Russia pos­sible? Raam op Rusland. … Continue read­ing

As an extreme example, North Korea is already oper­at­ing their own fully state-con­trolled splinternet.

Twenty years ago, North Korea built, based on the same inter­net pro­to­cols, its nation­al intranet, known as Kwangmyong, or bright light: like the inter­net as we know it, its con­tent is access­ible via web browsers, has an intern­al search engine, and offers e‑mail and news­group ser­vices. Only for­eign­ers and a small num­ber of gov­ern­ment offi­cials, aca­dem­ics, and elites are allowed to use the glob­al inter­net in North Korea, mak­ing Kwangmyong, a free ser­vice for pub­lic use, the only net­work avail­able to the vast major­ity of North Korean cit­izens… which is mon­itored by the gov­ern­ment.”
Source: Medium; Enrique Dans 7Dans, E. (2020, July 22). Understanding the splin­ter­net: can the world ever be truly glob­al? Medium; Enrique Dans. … Continue read­ing

Europe is by no means mak­ing itself more inclus­ive, either. Forcing GDPR upon the inter­na­tion­al com­munity might encour­age more nations and regions to enact far-reach­ing legis­la­tion affect­ing the internet.

The European Union’s sweep­ing data pri­vacy law, the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), sent many com­pan­ies scram­bling to come into com­pli­ance (or at least attempt to) pri­or to its imple­ment­a­tion in May 2018. The EU law covered EU cit­izens’ data any­where in the world, mean­ing com­pan­ies glob­ally would have to com­ply or face fines up to 20 mil­lion euro or 2% of their annu­al glob­al turnover (or rev­en­ue) per viol­a­tion, whichever is the great­er amount.”
Source: Business News Daily 8Uzialko, A. (2020, February 4). How GDPR Is Impacting Business and What to Expect in 2023. Business News Daily. https://​www​.busi​ness​news​daily​.com/​1​5​5​1​0​-​g​d​p​r​-​i​n​-​r​e​v​i​e​w​-​d​a​t​a​-​p​r​i​v​a​c​y​.​h​tml

And Europe isn’t pre­cisely doing itself any favours, either. The approv­al of the con­tro­ver­sial Copyright Directive has since been described as a “dark day for the internet”.

Despite set­backs, the most con­tro­ver­sial clauses in the Copyright Directive — Article 11 or the ‘link tax’ and Article 13 or the ‘upload fil­ter’ — have remained largely intact. Article 11 lets pub­lish­ers charge plat­forms like Google News when they dis­play snip­pets of news stor­ies, while Article 13 (renamed Article 17 in the most recent draft of the legis­la­tion) gives sites like YouTube new duties to stop users from upload­ing copy­righted con­tent. In both cases, crit­ics say these well-inten­tioned laws will cre­ate trouble. Article 13, for example, could lead to the intro­duc­tion of “upload fil­ters” that will scan all user con­tent before it’s uploaded to sites to remove copy­righted mater­i­al. The law does not expli­citly call for such fil­ters, but crit­ics say it will be an inev­it­ab­il­ity as sites seek to avoid pen­al­ties.”
Source: The Verge 9Vincent, J. (2019, March 26). Europe’s con­tro­ver­sial over­haul of online copy­right receives final approv­al. The Verge. https://​www​.theverge​.com/​2​0​1​9​/​3​/​2​6​/​1​8​2​8​0​7​2​6​/​e​u​r​o​p​e​-​c​o​p​y​r​i​g​h​t​-​d​i​r​e​c​t​ive

In many ways, it makes sense to argue that the splin­ter­net is already upon us — and that we, if we still believe in the idea of one inter­net, must act now to sal­vage whatever we can of what remains of net neut­ral­ity and the idea of free­dom of speech for everyone.

As the web becomes more splintered and inform­a­tion more con­trolled across the globe, we risk the deteri­or­a­tion of demo­crat­ic sys­tems, the cor­rup­tion of free mar­kets and fur­ther cyber mis­in­form­a­tion cam­paigns. We must act now to save a free and open inter­net from cen­sor­ship and inter­na­tion­al man­oeuv­ring before his­tory is bound to repeat itself.”
Source: TechCrunch 10Wright, K. (2019, March 13). The “splin­ter­net” is already here | TechCrunch. https://​tech​crunch​.com/​2​0​1​9​/​0​3​/​1​3​/​t​h​e​-​s​p​l​i​n​t​e​r​n​e​t​-​i​s​-​a​l​r​e​a​d​y​-​h​e​re/

One might reas­on­ably argue that the inter­net has always been splintered; the inter­net has nev­er been one inter­net.

One could even go so far as to make the case that striv­ing for one inter­net is cul­tur­al imper­i­al­ism.

It’s an unpop­u­lar opin­ion, but the US and British tech­no­lo­gists who cre­ated the inter­net and the web, respect­ively — as well as the hip­pies who artic­u­lated the early “inform­a­tion wants to be free” eth­os — were cul­tur­al imper­i­al­ists and free-speech fun­da­ment­al­ists.”
Source: Computerworld 11Elgan, M. (2019, July 27). How I learned to stop wor­ry­ing and love the splin­ter­net. Computerworld. … Continue read­ing

Is the dream of a single inter­net con­nect­ing the glob­al com­munity on fair and open grounds a naïve pipe dream?

Or are we just mani­fest­ing a breed­ing ground for social divi­sion and crim­in­al activ­ity? Is the inter­net merely an amp­li­fic­a­tion cham­ber for the tycoons of mass reach and the silent miners?

[…] everything we do on the net­work is mon­itored and sur­veilled by both gov­ern­ments and the huge cor­por­a­tions that now dom­in­ate cyber­space. (If you want to see the com­mer­cial side of this in action, install Ghostery in your browser and see who’s snoop­ing on you as you surf.) Internet users are assailed by spam, phish­ing, mal­ware, fraud and iden­tity theft. Corporate and gov­ern­ment data­bases are routinely hacked and huge troves of per­son­al data, cred­it card and bank account details are stolen and offered for sale in the shad­ows of the so-called “dark web”. Companies – and pub­lic insti­tu­tions such as hos­pit­als – are increas­ingly black­mailed by ransom­ware attacks, which make their essen­tial IT sys­tems unus­able unless they pay a ransom. Cybercrime has already reached alarm­ing levels and, because it largely goes unpun­ished, will con­tin­ue to grow – which is why in some soci­et­ies old-style phys­ic­al crime is redu­cing as prac­ti­tion­ers move to the much safer and more luc­rat­ive online vari­ety.”
Source: The Guardian 12Naughton, J. (2016, November 27). Has the inter­net become a failed state? The Guardian. https://​www​.the​guard​i​an​.com/​t​e​c​h​n​o​l​o​g​y​/​2​0​1​6​/​n​o​v​/​2​7​/​h​a​s​-​i​n​t​e​r​n​e​t​-​b​e​c​o​m​e​-​f​a​i​l​e​d​-​s​t​a​t​e​-​c​r​i​m​e​-​c​y​b​e​r​s​p​ace

And we still haven’t scratched the sur­face of the poten­tial chal­lenges we face regard­ing big data and integrity.

Google could be buy­ing your med­ic­al data without your know­ledge to sell it on to insur­ance com­pan­ies. Perhaps you’ve restric­ted your Facebook pri­vacy set­tings, but Facebook can still track you across oth­er web­sites. Maybe you identi­fy as a gender or eth­nic group that is served dif­fer­ent adverts because an algorithm determ­ines that you’re not appro­pri­ate for cer­tain jobs or hous­ing and cred­it options. Even the news you read online may be delib­er­ately mis­lead­ing or dis­hon­est, in the hope of manip­u­lat­ing your polit­ic­al opin­ions.”
Source: The Conversation 13Benjamin, G. (2019, November 27). Tim Berners-Lee: web inventor’s plan to save the inter­net is admir­able, but doomed to fail. The Conversation. … Continue read­ing

The crit­ics and pess­im­ists can’t just be flag­rantly ignored; they make a wide range of sol­id points that must be taken seriously.

The ori­gin­al idea, as described by its many evan­gel­ists, was that the inter­net would demo­crat­ise the good and dis­rupt the bad. It would get rid of the gate­keep­ers, do away with nation­al bound­ar­ies — and all this would rad­ic­ally change soci­ety for the bet­ter. […] Rather than pro­mot­ing eco­nom­ic fair­ness, it is the cent­ral reas­on for the grow­ing gulf between rich and poor and the hol­low­ing out of the middle class. Rather than mak­ing us wealth­i­er, the so-called shar­ing eco­nomy is mak­ing us poorer. Rather than cre­at­ing more jobs, auto­ma­tion is des­troy­ing jobs. And rather than increas­ing com­pet­i­tion, it has cre­ated immensely power­ful new glob­al mono­pol­ies like Google
and Facebook.”
Source: Saturday Evening Post 14Slon, S. (2015, July 27). The Internet Has Failed Us. The Saturday Evening Post. https://​www​.sat​urdayeven​ing​post​.com/​2​0​1​5​/​0​7​/​i​n​t​e​r​n​e​t​-​f​a​i​l​e​d​-​us/

We can­not know wheth­er the idea of a single inter­net — or the lack there­of — holds the keys to a bet­ter tomorrow.

Still, while the inter­net might nev­er have been “one inter­net”, there has been some open­ness, free­dom, and matur­ity. If noth­ing else, this is some­thing that we still stand to lose.

The oper­a­tion of the inter­net depends on the coördin­a­tion of infra­struc­ture like cables, pro­tocol suites, and actu­al applic­a­tions in people’s daily lives. The main goal of inter­net gov­ernance is to keep the coördin­a­tion of these three divi­sions. Although there are dif­fer­ences among coun­tries in regard of stand­ards and man­age­ment of infra­struc­ture and pro­tocol suites, a gen­er­ally mature gov­ernance sys­tem has been formed.”
Source: Global Times 15Kai, J. (2020, August 11). Washington inflames cyber-Balkanization and splin­ter­net with politi­cized moves — Global Times. Global Times. https://​www​.glob​al​times​.cn/​p​a​g​e​/​2​0​2​0​0​8​/​1​1​9​7​4​2​6​.​s​h​tml

Should we con­tin­ue to fight for a glob­al web? Should we con­tin­ue to fight for an open and neut­ral web? Or was it just a naïve idea to begin with?

I think of Jan Stenbeck (1942 – 2002), the legendary Swedish entre­pren­eur. His busi­ness philo­sophy, as described by bio­graphy author Per Andersson, can be summed up: 16Jan Stenbeck. (2023, December 26). In Wikipedia. https://​en​.wiki​pe​dia​.org/​w​i​k​i​/​J​a​n​_​S​t​e​n​b​eck 17Per Andersson (journ­al­ist). (2024, January 10). In Wikipedia. https://​sv​.wiki​pe​dia​.org/​w​i​k​i​/​P​e​r​_​A​n​d​e​r​s​s​o​n​_​(​j​o​u​r​n​a​l​ist)

  • Someone has an idea.
  • However, money defeats ideas.
  • But then, polit­ics defeats money.
  • Ultimately, tech­no­logy defeats politics.
Signature - Jerry Silfwer - Doctor Spin

Thanks for read­ing. Please sup­port my blog by shar­ing art­icles with oth­er com­mu­nic­a­tions and mar­ket­ing pro­fes­sion­als. You might also con­sider my PR ser­vices or speak­ing engage­ments.

PR Resource: PR Must Adapt (Or Die)

Spin Academy | Online PR Courses

The Digital Transformation of PR

The biggest chal­lenge in mod­ern pub­lic rela­tions is the con­stantly chan­ging media land­scape. With the pro­lif­er­a­tion of social media, the rise of fake news, and the decline of tra­di­tion­al journ­al­ism, it can be dif­fi­cult for organ­isa­tions to con­trol the spread of inform­a­tion and pro­tect their reputations. 

When Brian Solis and Deirdre Breakenridge pub­lished Putting the Public Back in Public Relations: How Social Media Is Reinventing the Aging Business of PR in 2009, it pro­posed how PR should embrace the digit­al-first media land­scape and elev­ate our pro­fes­sion to new heights. 18Solis, B. & D. Breakenridge (2009, February 1). Putting the Public Back in Public Relations: How Social Media Is Reinventing the Aging Business of PR. Amazon​.com: Books. … Continue read­ing

Public rela­tions pro­fes­sion­als must be stra­tegic and pro­act­ive in their approach and must be able to adapt to new tech­no­lo­gies and plat­forms to com­mu­nic­ate with their pub­lics effectively. 

The authors argue that earli­er paradigms are mostly inad­equate in address­ing the needs of a 21st Century in which com­mu­nic­a­tion tech­no­logy is cre­at­ing rap­id glob­al­iz­a­tion while it is dan­ger­ously exacer­bat­ing the ten­sions of mul­ti­cul­tur­al­ism. Through a crit­ic­al dis­cus­sion of pri­or assump­tions and paradigms in pub­lic rela­tions schol­ar­ship, the authors under­line the need for pub­lic rela­tions to revital­ize and bring its body of know­ledge into the 21st Century. The authors pos­it and dis­cuss how the com­munity-build­ing the­ory ori­gin­ally espoused by Kruckeberg and Starck (1988) and mod­i­fied in sub­sequent schol­ar­ship can provide a viable depar­ture point toward devel­op­ing new approaches to research about and prac­tice of pub­lic rela­tions that can take into account the dynam­ic envir­on­ment wrought by changes in com­mu­nic­a­tion tech­no­logy.”
Source: Public Relations Review 19Valentini, C., Kruckeberg, D., & Starck, K. (2012). Public rela­tions and com­munity: A per­sist­ent cov­en­ant. Public Relations Review, 38(5), 873 – 879. https://​doi​.org/​1​0​.​1​0​1​6​/​j​.​p​u​b​r​e​v​.​2​0​1​2​.​0​6​.​001

The biggest chal­lenge in PR is ensur­ing that our pro­fes­sion keeps up with new com­mu­nic­a­tion tech­no­logy and stays valu­able and rel­ev­ant as a busi­ness function.

Learn more: PR Must Adapt (Or Die)

Logo - Spin Academy - Online PR Courses
ANNOTATIONS
ANNOTATIONS
1 Splinternet. (2022, December 12). In Wikipedia. https://​en​.wiki​pe​dia​.org/​w​i​k​i​/​S​p​l​i​n​t​e​r​net
2 Holmes, A. (2020, August 6). The “splin­ter­net”: How US-China ten­sion could end the world wide web. Business Insider. https://​www​.busi​ness​in​sider​.com/​s​p​l​i​n​t​e​r​n​e​t​-​u​s​-​c​h​i​n​a​-​i​n​t​e​r​n​e​t​-​t​r​u​m​p​-​p​o​m​p​e​o​-​f​i​r​e​w​a​l​l​-​2​020 – 8?r=US&IR=T
3 Tsunashima, T. (2020, November 25). China rises as world’s data super­power as inter­net frac­tures. Nikkei Asia. https://​asia​.nikkei​.com/​P​o​l​i​t​i​c​s​/​I​n​t​e​r​n​a​t​i​o​n​a​l​-​r​e​l​a​t​i​o​n​s​/​C​h​i​n​a​-​r​i​s​e​s​-​a​s​-​w​o​r​l​d​-​s​-​d​a​t​a​-​s​u​p​e​r​p​o​w​e​r​-​a​s​-​i​n​t​e​r​n​e​t​-​f​r​a​c​t​u​r​e​s​?​f​b​c​l​i​d​=​I​w​A​R​3​p​C​j​u​X​7​c​A​M​5​Y​T​o​4​1​c​z​O​k​T​7​H​3​g​b​5​X​E​s​W​n​A​9​5​D​6​W​B​P​p​r​A​c​M​W​V​F​r​e​b​S​D​6​PTY
4 Newton, C. (2020, August 18). How the forced sale of TikTok could splinter the inter­net. The Verge. https://​www​.theverge​.com/​i​n​t​e​r​f​a​c​e​/​2​0​2​0​/​8​/​1​8​/​2​1​3​7​2​0​8​7​/​t​i​k​t​o​k​-​s​a​l​e​-​r​a​m​i​f​i​c​a​t​i​o​n​s​-​s​p​l​i​n​t​e​r​n​e​t​-​c​h​i​n​a​-​t​r​ump
5 Bego, K. (2016). The Splinternet. Nesta. https://​www​.nesta​.org​.uk/​f​e​a​t​u​r​e​/​1​0​-​p​r​e​d​i​c​t​i​o​n​s​-​2​0​1​7​/​t​h​e​-​s​p​l​i​n​t​e​r​n​et/
6 Epifanova, A. (2020, May 18). Is tight­en­ing con­trol via “Sovereign Splinternet” in Russia pos­sible? Raam op Rusland. https://​www​.raamo​prus​land​.nl/​d​o​s​s​i​e​r​s​/​r​e​c​h​t​s​s​t​a​a​t​-​e​n​-​c​i​v​i​l​-​s​o​c​i​e​t​y​/​1​5​4​4​-​i​s​-​t​i​g​h​t​e​n​i​n​g​-​c​o​n​t​r​o​l​-​v​i​a​-​s​o​v​e​r​e​i​g​n​-​s​p​l​i​n​t​e​r​n​e​t​-​i​n​-​r​u​s​s​i​a​-​p​o​s​s​i​ble
7 Dans, E. (2020, July 22). Understanding the splin­ter­net: can the world ever be truly glob­al? Medium; Enrique Dans. https://​medi​um​.com/​e​n​r​i​q​u​e​-​d​a​n​s​/​u​n​d​e​r​s​t​a​n​d​i​n​g​-​t​h​e​-​s​p​l​i​n​t​e​r​n​e​t​-​c​a​n​-​t​h​e​-​w​o​r​l​d​-​e​v​e​r​-​b​e​-​t​r​u​l​y​-​g​l​o​b​a​l​-​9​7​2​6​2​a​6​0​6​78c
8 Uzialko, A. (2020, February 4). How GDPR Is Impacting Business and What to Expect in 2023. Business News Daily. https://​www​.busi​ness​news​daily​.com/​1​5​5​1​0​-​g​d​p​r​-​i​n​-​r​e​v​i​e​w​-​d​a​t​a​-​p​r​i​v​a​c​y​.​h​tml
9 Vincent, J. (2019, March 26). Europe’s con­tro­ver­sial over­haul of online copy­right receives final approv­al. The Verge. https://​www​.theverge​.com/​2​0​1​9​/​3​/​2​6​/​1​8​2​8​0​7​2​6​/​e​u​r​o​p​e​-​c​o​p​y​r​i​g​h​t​-​d​i​r​e​c​t​ive
10 Wright, K. (2019, March 13). The “splin­ter­net” is already here | TechCrunch. https://​tech​crunch​.com/​2​0​1​9​/​0​3​/​1​3​/​t​h​e​-​s​p​l​i​n​t​e​r​n​e​t​-​i​s​-​a​l​r​e​a​d​y​-​h​e​re/
11 Elgan, M. (2019, July 27). How I learned to stop wor­ry­ing and love the splin­ter­net. Computerworld. https://​www​.com​puter​world​.com/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​/​3​4​1​1​9​4​7​/​h​o​w​-​i​-​l​e​a​r​n​e​d​-​t​o​-​s​t​o​p​-​w​o​r​r​y​i​n​g​-​a​n​d​-​l​o​v​e​-​t​h​e​-​s​p​l​i​n​t​e​r​n​e​t​.​h​tml
12 Naughton, J. (2016, November 27). Has the inter­net become a failed state? The Guardian. https://​www​.the​guard​i​an​.com/​t​e​c​h​n​o​l​o​g​y​/​2​0​1​6​/​n​o​v​/​2​7​/​h​a​s​-​i​n​t​e​r​n​e​t​-​b​e​c​o​m​e​-​f​a​i​l​e​d​-​s​t​a​t​e​-​c​r​i​m​e​-​c​y​b​e​r​s​p​ace
13 Benjamin, G. (2019, November 27). Tim Berners-Lee: web inventor’s plan to save the inter­net is admir­able, but doomed to fail. The Conversation. https://​thecon​ver​sa​tion​.com/​t​i​m​-​b​e​r​n​e​r​s​-​l​e​e​-​w​e​b​-​i​n​v​e​n​t​o​r​s​-​p​l​a​n​-​t​o​-​s​a​v​e​-​t​h​e​-​i​n​t​e​r​n​e​t​-​i​s​-​a​d​m​i​r​a​b​l​e​-​b​u​t​-​d​o​o​m​e​d​-​t​o​-​f​a​i​l​-​1​2​7​840
14 Slon, S. (2015, July 27). The Internet Has Failed Us. The Saturday Evening Post. https://​www​.sat​urdayeven​ing​post​.com/​2​0​1​5​/​0​7​/​i​n​t​e​r​n​e​t​-​f​a​i​l​e​d​-​us/
15 Kai, J. (2020, August 11). Washington inflames cyber-Balkanization and splin­ter­net with politi­cized moves — Global Times. Global Times. https://​www​.glob​al​times​.cn/​p​a​g​e​/​2​0​2​0​0​8​/​1​1​9​7​4​2​6​.​s​h​tml
16 Jan Stenbeck. (2023, December 26). In Wikipedia. https://​en​.wiki​pe​dia​.org/​w​i​k​i​/​J​a​n​_​S​t​e​n​b​eck
17 Per Andersson (journ­al­ist). (2024, January 10). In Wikipedia. https://​sv​.wiki​pe​dia​.org/​w​i​k​i​/​P​e​r​_​A​n​d​e​r​s​s​o​n​_​(​j​o​u​r​n​a​l​ist)
18 Solis, B. & D. Breakenridge (2009, February 1). Putting the Public Back in Public Relations: How Social Media Is Reinventing the Aging Business of PR. Amazon​.com: Books. https://​www​.amazon​.com/​d​p​/​0​1​3​7​1​5​0​6​9​5​?​t​a​g​=​p​r​2​0​0​f​-​2​0​&​c​a​m​p​=​1​4​5​7​3​&​c​r​e​a​t​i​v​e​=​3​2​7​6​4​1​&​l​i​n​k​C​o​d​e​=​a​s​1​&​c​r​e​a​t​i​v​e​A​S​I​N​=​0​1​3​7​1​5​0​6​9​5​&​a​d​i​d​=​0​2​J​7​6​Y​W​6​R​9​G​X​V​R​C​C​J​J​M0&
19 Valentini, C., Kruckeberg, D., & Starck, K. (2012). Public rela­tions and com­munity: A per­sist­ent cov­en­ant. Public Relations Review, 38(5), 873 – 879. https://​doi​.org/​1​0​.​1​0​1​6​/​j​.​p​u​b​r​e​v​.​2​0​1​2​.​0​6​.​001
Jerry Silfwer
Jerry Silfwerhttps://doctorspin.net/
Jerry Silfwer, alias Doctor Spin, is an awarded senior adviser specialising in public relations and digital strategy. Currently CEO at Spin Factory and KIX Communication Index. Before that, he worked at Kaufmann, Whispr Group, Springtime PR, and Spotlight PR. Based in Stockholm, Sweden.
Advertisment

The Cover Photo

The cover photo isn't related to public relations obviously; it's just a photo of mine. Think of it as a 'decorative diversion', a subtle reminder that it's good to have hobbies outside work.

The cover photo has

Advertisment

.

Subscribe to Spin Control—it’s 100% free!

Join 2,550+ fellow PR lovers and subscribe to Jerry’s free newsletter on communication and psychology.
What will you get?

> PR commentary on current events.
> Subscriber-only VIP content.
> My personal PR slides for .key and .ppt.
> Discounts on upcoming PR courses.
> Ebook on getting better PR ideas.
Subscribe to Spin Control today by clicking SUBMIT and get your first send-out instantly.


Latest Posts
Similar Posts
Most Popular
Advertisment