I’m not a journalist.
“Give us commentary on current events.”
This is common feedback, but I won’t accommodate this request. I won’t promise anyone journalistic services, and I cherish the privilege of not having opinions on everything.
Here we go:
I’m Not a Journalist
I’m not trying to give anyone the news. I’m not a journalist.
In terms of what I promise and what I don’t promise, I strive to be mindful of the follower contract.
Spin Academy | Online PR Courses
The Follower Contract
How can brands better understand follower engagement? Think of every follow as an invisible contract.
Rules of Engagement
Dear brand,
Best regards,
Your New Follower
Think of every single follower, fan, and subscriber having such an agreement with your brand.
Learn more: The Follower Contract
💡 Subscribe and get a free ebook on how to get better PR.
Since I run a business based on advising organisations, I strive to share evergreen content rather than provide news commentary.
If I promise to be a destination for the latest commentary on current events, I must commit to deliver on that promise long-term.
And that I cannot do.
Learn more: I’m Not a Journalist
The Media Polarisation Model
We often hear how the media climate is “polarised” — a known and reasonably well-understood effect of classic media logic.
It also seems true that social media logic has amplified the effects of polarisation by grouping people into echo chambers where confirmation bias, conversion theory, and the hostile media effect are allowed to roam freely without any checks and balances.
“Political elites, partisan media, and social media contribute to societal-level political polarization, leading to misperceptions of division among the electorate and fueling animosity and actual ideological polarization over time.”
Source: Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences 1Wilson, A., Parker, V., & Feinberg, M. (2020). Polarization in the contemporary political and media landscape. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 34, 223 – 228. … Continue reading
More profoundly, media polarisation is problematic because it draws false lines between extremes that aren’t necessarily perpendicular. These “false lines” will force otherwise balanced media consumers to place themselves between the media-suggested extremes.
At the extremes, sheltered by the social safety of a like-minded peer group (i.e. echo chamber), it’s possible to disregard opposing evidence as “attacks” on their position. As the amplification hypothesis states, any such attacks will only strengthen the position of the extremes.
The harder you attack someone verbally, the more you convince them of their belief, not yours.
The Post-Truth Zone
The amplification hypothesis sustains a post-truth zone at the extremes through media polarisation. If a) the zone is wide enough and b) the extremes are sufficiently close to each other, the forced “balanced” position between them will also result in the post-truth zone.
“Post-truth is a societal phenomenon, influenced by the expectation that honesty is the default position, and the public tolerance of inaccurate and undefended allegations in politics.”
Source: Nature 2Higgins, K. (2016). Post-truth: a guide for the perplexed. Nature, 540, 9 – 9. https://doi.org/10.1038/540009a
Since the forced “balanced” position will have a hard time sheltering anyone from our fear of social isolation, the spiral of silence partially explains why extremes are so effective in silencing the majority of otherwise balanced media consumers. 3Silfwer, J. (2020, June 4). The Spiral of Silence. Doctor Spin | The PR Blog. https://doctorspin.net/spiral-of-silence/
Why Media Polarisation is Disturbing
Like everyone else, I have opinions. However, as a PR professional with 18+ years of experience, I can analyse media issues without siding with any of the extremes.
But no matter how professional my analysis of a current media issue is, I risk blowback from left and right extremes — with no backing from the silent majority.
Many feel compelled by the news media to choose between outlandish extremes — or settle for an equally outlandish middle ground.
Media trends tend to be cyclical, and I estimate that the post-truth era peaked in 2019. My hope, however, is that the pandemic, followed by global inflation and AI progress, will dampen the media’s interest in extreme positions and shrink the width of the post-truth zone.
“Post-truth communication has shaped our understanding of truth, politics, and the media, with its impact on public policy, history, and social media.”
Source: Social Studies of Science 4Sismondo, S. (2017). Post-truth? Social Studies of Science, 47, 3 — 6. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312717692076
Still, it’s disturbing that the rational business decision for many academics, professionals, and organisations is to strategically steer clear of topics taken “hostage” by left and right extremists — or for organisations to opt for the media blackout tactic.
Normalise Not Having an Opinion
More often than not, in a post-truth society, having no opinion suddenly seems like the only rational escape.
My opinion?
Let’s normalise not having one.
The iron prescription (mental model). Senior advisor Charlie Munger argued: “I have what I call an ‘iron prescription’ that helps me keep sane when I naturally drift toward preferring one ideology over another. I feel that I’m not entitled to have an opinion unless I can state the arguments against my position better than the people who are in opposition. I think that I am qualified to speak only when I’ve reached that state” (Knodell, 2016). 5Knodell, P. A. (2016). All I want to know is where I’m going to die so I’ll never go there: Buffett & Munger – A study in simplicity and uncommon, common sense. PAK Publishing.
Learn more: The Media Polarisation Model
I’m Not Even On the Spectrum
All journalism today has gone political. They’ve gone either far left or far right.
It’s a shame, really. Many news stories are worth analysing from a non-extremist perspective. However, the discourse around current events is much too polarised, and as a person who favours win-win and balance in my personal life, I refuse to incentivise extreme positions.
It’s a forcing myth perpetrated by both the left and the right that all competent individuals choosing the silent path still favor one side over the other.
Well, I don’t.
I’m not even on the spectrum between their positions.
THANKS FOR READING.
Need PR help? Hire me here.
What should you study next?
Spin Academy | Online PR Courses
Spin’s PR School: Free Media PR Course
Elevate your public relations skills with this free Media PR Course—a must-have resource for all aspiring public relations professionals. Boost your career now!
Media Theory
Media Logic
Journalism
Digital Media
Learn more: All Free PR Courses
💡 Subscribe and get a free ebook on how to get better PR.
Annotations
1 | Wilson, A., Parker, V., & Feinberg, M. (2020). Polarization in the contemporary political and media landscape. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 34, 223 – 228. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/yqvzc |
---|---|
2 | Higgins, K. (2016). Post-truth: a guide for the perplexed. Nature, 540, 9 – 9. https://doi.org/10.1038/540009a |
3 | Silfwer, J. (2020, June 4). The Spiral of Silence. Doctor Spin | The PR Blog. https://doctorspin.net/spiral-of-silence/ |
4 | Sismondo, S. (2017). Post-truth? Social Studies of Science, 47, 3 — 6. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312717692076 |
5 | Knodell, P. A. (2016). All I want to know is where I’m going to die so I’ll never go there: Buffett & Munger – A study in simplicity and uncommon, common sense. PAK Publishing. |