AI has made me rethink nature photography.
Eight years ago, I discovered nature photography as a hobby. Smartphone cameras had been improving rapidly for quite some time, but for whatever reason, I developed a preference for setting my exposures manually and extracting flat, information-rich raw files that invited less destructive post-editing.
Yes, my photos were typically better than most smartphone photos plastered all over social media.
But “better” is a complicated concept — it turns out.
“Better” was the justification I used to overcome my ego and justify my indulgent social media presence. I felt that it was okay to publish my nature photographs and, by doing so, ask people to consume my content in competition with so much else.
Today, “better” is no longer a worthwhile consideration.
At this very moment, AI easily outperforms my nature photography. And wherever photorealistic image generation stands today, it’s still the worst it’ll ever be. And to be honest, my creative attempts as a hobbyist were amateurish anyway.
Truth to be told, my passion for the hobby was already dying. Powerful AI tools inside my RAW editing software were making it possible to manipulate real images in profound ways.
Clutter in the background? A boring cloud cover?
With a click of a button, I could give my photos a striking set of dramatic clouds, adding depth and drama to my shot. Or I could remove any disturbing details with ease.
What am I doing here? On the one hand, I should do what I can to present a photo that closely matches my intended vision; I don’t want to waste anyone’s time with mediocre content. There’s enough of that, surely.
On the other hand, in what way does a photorealistic fantasy contribute anything of substance to the world? Sure, the suspension of disbelief offers a welcome escape into the world of fiction, but what has that got to do with me throwing a camera over my shoulder and going out for a walk in the woods?
So, I don’t feel the need to take my camera out on adventures anymore. I can experience the beauty of nature without documenting anything. Nevertheless, I sure do miss my passion for nature photography.
Should I find a way to recapture my lost passion?
Or should I move on and find other, perhaps more AI-safe, pastimes to be passionate about?
Sure, the harsh truth is that I must renegotiate whatever I believed to be true and reassess. I must tear everything down and rebuild my entire thinking around nature photography from the ground up. But I’m beginning to think that hard resets of this kind are fast becoming existential necessities.
Because, honestly, nothing is AI-safe.
The way I need to rethink nature photography, both for myself and as a means of creating online experiences for others, is the way we all must rethink almost everything.
As an amateur and a hobbyist, when I share a nature photo, I must come to terms with the fact that I’m not sharing a nature photo.
I’m sharing a part of myself.
Because nature photos are easily generated and abundant. The only reason for anyone to take an interest is to connect with me, a human being, and share something about what it means to be human, at some level or another.
My nature photo is nothing more than a medium for this relationship — no matter how fleeting that connection may be. Even if the published photo turned out quite nicely and I’m proud to show it off on social media or wherever, its underlying purpose is to foster human connection.
So, what makes my nature photos worth other people’s time and attention? It’s not the photo’s objective quality (and it probably never was). No, it’s about whether the photo says anything about the human perspective as I experience it, or if it’s just another generic nature photo on social media.
Self-expression.
This mindshift changes nature photography for me. If I want to continue taking beautiful nature photos and sharing them on social media with purpose and passion, I must not seek striking, quality scenes to share; I must seek to relate the experience the scene evokes in me.
If I can teach myself how to express my uniqueness — or sameness! — while using nature photos as the medium of such messages, the objective quality of my photography becomes only one of many considerations of lesser importance.
And as the photographic quality becomes a secondary priority, so does the use of AI to enhance it.
As fate would have it, this is exactly how the top 1% in any creative field already operates. They’ve mastered a specific craft not to produce high-quality work, but to express themselves through their chosen art form.
Thanks for reading. Need a PR specialist?
Please contact Jerry for a consultation.