We need a slight edge in PRโโโwe need SEO.
Growing up playยญing hockey, our coach often reminded us, โSecond place is the first loser.โ
Tough love, I guess.
Inbound marยญketยญing is kind of the same. Itโs disยญproยญporยญtionยญally expensยญive to come in second.
But the silยญver linยญing is that you only need to win by a little to win big.
And this seems to be espeยญcially true for SEO.
Hereโs why:
The Wimbledon Prize Money
Weโre all someยญwhat familยญiยญar with the beneยญfits of finยญishยญing first, but we rarely acknowยญledge how devยญastยญatยญing it can be to finยญish second.
In the 2016 Wimbledon Championships, the male and female singles winยญners colยญlecยญted ยฃ2,000,000 in prize money.
The runยญner-ups? They received half of thatโโโยฃ1,000,000. Thatโs a lot of money, but only half of the winยญners got it.
The singles winยญners also colยญlecยญted 2,000 valuยญable chamยญpiยญonยญship points, whereยญas the male runยญner-up colยญlecยญted 1,200 points and the female runยญner-up 1,300 points.
In addiยญtion to prize money, thereโs the massive pubยญliยญcity boost that comes from winยญning the Wimbledon tourยญnaยญment. Including the effects on sponยญsorยญships and fanยญbase growth.
โTo the vicยญtor go the spoils,โ right?
In the case of Wimbledon, we rarely encounter tourยญnaยญment winยญners that are twice as good as their finalยญist opponents.
In othยญer instances, the runยญner-up fair even worse. If ten comยญpanยญies comยญpete for a single cusยญtomยญer, nine out of ten will lose out on 100%. And it doesยญnโt matยญter how small the losยญing marยญgin was.
The beneยญfits of sucยญcess are rarely evenly disยญtribยญuted; itโs the natยญurยญal outยญcome of the power-law disยญtriยญbuยญtion.
The Winner Takes All Principle
Still, the โwinยญner-takes-allโ is no new concept in economics.
David S. Evans and Richard Schmalensee, authors of Matchmakers: The New Economics of Multisided Platforms, argue that such marยญkets are less and less of a sure thing in todayโs netยญworked economy.
In an HBR artยญicle, the authors conclude:
โThe mesยญsage is simple: beware of the siren song of netยญwork effects, winยญner-take-all, and first-mover advantยญages. Network effects can creยญate great value rapยญidly, but they can desยญtroy it just as fast.โ
The Slight Edge in SEO
A slight edge can have massive effects. The marยญket leadยญer might only have to be 1% betยญter than their closest comยญpetยญitยญor to win 80โโโ90% more business.
Finishing second in SEO is long-term expensยญive. Because most of the time, the winยญner does take the most of it.
As for SEO, the slight edge seems to be of sigยญniยญficยญant importance:
If you manยญage to rank in Google, it matยญters that organยญic first-page resยญults will colยญlect 90% of all traffic. The first, second, and third organยญic search resยญults will attract 61% clicks. And out of all the traffic, the numยญber one organยญic search resยญult will colยญlect 33% of all traffic while the second organยญic search resยญult will get nearly halfโโโ17,6% (The First Page of Google by the Numbers).
As any social media natยญurยญal will tell you, there are plenty of online tacยญtics to take advantยญage of the slight edge. One instance is where you strive to build conยญtent skyยญscrapers (also known as the skyยญscraper techยญnique) by barely adding just enough qualยญity to push yourยญself onto the top position.
In sumยญmary:
Either you go after it (a top keyword rank, an interest group or segยญment, a tarยญget conยญverยญsion rate etc.), and you make 100% sure to get itโโโor youโd be betยญter off shiftยญing your resources elsewhere.
THANKS FOR READING.
Need PR help? Hire me here.